Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

48-482 no FM
#7

I think I have come across an error in the schematic.  The resistance for the primary of Z401 is clearly listed at 70 ohms.  I physically removed and disassembled Z401 to see if I could find what would cause the resistance to be only 6.6 ohms.  I concluded that the true resistance is 6.6 ohms (I unsoldered the connection to the cap to be sure it wasn't the problem), which makes me thing the schematic should read 7.0 ohms, not 70.  I was thinking I pulled it out for no reason, but I confirmed what the resistance is.

This makes me wonder if there is a similar discrepancy in the resistances shown for the secondary of Z400.  Could they be 21 and 1.5 instead of 21 and 15 ohms?  Z400 would be a bear to remove, being under the FM switch.

Can anybody tell me what it really should be?


Messages In This Thread
48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-10-2017, 07:18 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by klondike98 - 09-10-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-10-2017, 08:41 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-10-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-12-2017, 01:35 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-14-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-14-2017, 10:19 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-15-2017, 12:35 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-15-2017, 04:28 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-15-2017, 09:22 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-15-2017, 10:44 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-16-2017, 11:06 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-17-2017, 06:38 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-19-2017, 12:37 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by klondike98 - 09-19-2017, 11:01 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-21-2017, 11:36 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-22-2017, 10:51 AM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>