Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

48-482 no FM
#10

22 ohms would not be unreasonable for a 455 kHz IF transformer coil, but a 9.1 MHz coil should read much lower than that.

Don't be afraid of trying the alignment, as the FM IF will almost certainly need adjustment. Sometimes it is the best way to determine if a problem exists in any of the tuned circuits of an IF stage. If you can't get a definite peak on any particular adjustment, then a problem exists with that related circuit.

I have a 48-482 and found the FM IF to be way out of alignment even though the trimmer adjustments were seemingly previously untouched. The mica compression trimmers have a tendency to drift in capacitance, especially after 70 years.

As to enough signal at 9.1 MHz, 5 mV should be more than enough if injected into the 7F8 grid at test point A. Try the full 5 mV first and see if you get any negative AVC voltage at the point I described previously. Use the minimum signal level into test point A that results in an increase in AVC voltage over the reading with no signal applied. Decrease the signal generator output as each tuned circuit comes into alignment.


Messages In This Thread
48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-10-2017, 07:18 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by klondike98 - 09-10-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-10-2017, 08:41 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-10-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-12-2017, 01:35 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-14-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-14-2017, 10:19 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-15-2017, 12:35 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-15-2017, 04:28 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by Mondial - 09-15-2017, 09:22 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-15-2017, 10:44 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-16-2017, 11:06 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-17-2017, 06:38 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-19-2017, 12:37 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by klondike98 - 09-19-2017, 11:01 AM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by robsradioactive - 09-21-2017, 11:36 PM
RE: 48-482 no FM - by rebrands - 09-22-2017, 10:51 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>