Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Beverage antenna
#4

apparently the beverage antenna's up now are off the ground only to accomodate the human interaction to see it and or set it up just high enough above head level.

the original patent i looked at actually implies that the optimum location for the antenna is directly on the ground!

if on the ground, insulation needed, if in the air bare conductor ok.

also interestingly enough the wire gauge optimum size is much smaller than i would have thought.

its purpose is to eliminate some of that atmospheric noise you run across making certain parts of your bands useless.... the sound you get that actually sounds like AC interference.... thats what it gets rid of.

I also have found that the signal amplitued is somewhat decreased but the perfectly clean signal is the trade. what was a signal you never would have noticed and rolled right past it now comes in.


Messages In This Thread
Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-28-2017, 04:40 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-28-2017, 05:05 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by Paul Philco322 - 11-28-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-29-2017, 10:47 AM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-29-2017, 11:42 AM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-29-2017, 11:43 AM
RE: Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-29-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-29-2017, 02:17 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-29-2017, 02:53 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by David - 11-29-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-30-2017, 12:03 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-30-2017, 01:28 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by jcassity - 11-30-2017, 05:52 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by EdHolland - 11-30-2017, 06:11 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by Paul Philco322 - 11-30-2017, 09:43 PM
RE: Beverage antenna - by Kenneth F. Besso Jr. - 12-01-2017, 06:18 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>