Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

UX201 or UV199 Substitute
#8

If it is possible to run the 6C4 on AC filament voltage it would require all 5 tubes to be replaced. This would probably still result in some hum since the cathode is jumpered to the filament.

I agree on the looks. I would not display a radio with these in it. My intentions were to use them for testing. The fellow that made similar substitutes a few years ago had some test tube glass to cover them with - even silvering some of them to replicate the getter. Maybe somebody could find some at a lab glass vendor. I haven't looked.

The problem with the WD-11 is the base, not just the pins. The pin spacing on a WD-11 is different than the 199, 80, 45 and so on. So you would have to make the whole base for an adaptor.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/


Messages In This Thread
UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-04-2017, 04:03 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Arran - 12-06-2017, 01:01 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Radioroslyn - 12-06-2017, 11:24 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-06-2017, 12:05 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Ron Ramirez - 12-06-2017, 01:34 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-06-2017, 02:18 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Arran - 12-07-2017, 01:01 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-07-2017, 12:05 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Substitute - by Arran - 12-08-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-08-2017, 01:01 PM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-10-2017, 02:51 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-10-2017, 11:06 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-11-2017, 12:49 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-11-2017, 11:29 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-12-2017, 06:26 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-12-2017, 11:55 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-13-2017, 03:51 AM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Gary I in fact did, on a 38-14, I think, where I had a speaker with the dead coil. Well...it kinda worked. Kinda, be...morzh — 10:38 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, what ever happened to that plan you had to try using a rare earth magnet to magnetize the pole? This looks like a...GarySP — 10:25 PM
RCA T62 is playing.....
Beautiful set.morzh — 09:07 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Well....here it is. The green stuff. Unfortunately, probably penetrates deep. I opened the top layer and saw that: ...morzh — 08:58 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: Really nice workmanship!!! Top of the chassis looks great. Sorry about the long winded e...MrFixr55 — 08:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Thank you for your reply. I will check voltages on the other tubes, look at resistor 23 and cap 25, etc. If all else fai...bluecap — 07:58 PM
RCA T62 is playing.....
Nice looking set great save. DavidDavid — 07:48 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Hello Jim, I have done several 89s. The trick is to move the drum in or out on it's shaft. You will need to loosen a set...dconant — 07:36 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
MrFixr Yes, it is my plan to go with 45rpm spider if I go that far. No, the pole was not left-handed as I unscrewed ...morzh — 07:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Change the tube. Check the tube's bias network. Are any other tubes experience the drop or just this?` Is resistor 23 OK...morzh — 07:09 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>