Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Adding A supply to this B Battery Eliminator
#14

Truth be told most of the times I've used the '317 is w/a 6-7v input. So the voltage drop (dissipation) across it has been minimal.  The 1st time was a copy of a circuit out of Popular Electronics back in the 80's. It used the 3A version but powered it w/a 36v transformer for a 6v output. Used a big heatsink and ran hot. I didn't really understand how it worked then and thought it needed the 36v to operate properly. This isn't the case the closer the input voltage is to the output voltage the better the IC likes it and will run cooler.

When I putting this one together I used a small transformer w/a hv winding and a 6.3 filament winding. Nowdays these transformers kind of expensive. That's why I picked the one from AES. It's close to what we need to terms of voltages and current but mostly it's easy to get. The HV side rated @ 200ma which is abt 10X what you need to power any battery set requiring A and B batteries. The divider eats up some of the current @ 6000 ohms it will consume abt 26ma. Still leaves 174ma. On the A side the voltage drop across the IC is about 8v. @ 200ma it's about 1.5w. Worst case is if you didn't heatsink it might overheat but it has a fail safe if it does it goes open till it cools then goes back to normal operation. If this is the case it's simple enough mount the IC to a scrap of aluminum or to the p/s metal chassis. Must use an insulator and some heatsink grease.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry


Messages In This Thread
RE: Adding A supply to this B Battery Eliminator - by Radioroslyn - 12-17-2017, 02:06 PM



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>