Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nathan's 112 Highboy
#9

Next up - a couple of the hacked up bakelite blocks.

#9 capacitor block is a 3615L (middle of below pic) - should be 3615D. The taped together connection with the 70K resistor original went to the middle terminal of that block.

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4722/3924...b0c8_z.jpg]

I had a 3615N block in my parts bin that I turned into 3615D just by rotating one of the terminals.  Icon_lol
Philco probably could've saved some more pennies by not making so many different (but similar) blocks!

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4744/2612...3d83_z.jpg]

#6 capacitor block is 3615W (lower left of below pic - with Zenith cap) - should be 3615J. Evidence of hackery as middle pin connections are there but floating.

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4722/3924...b0c8_z.jpg]

This was a seemingly easy fix as I found a 3615J in my parts box. I restuffed it and installed it:
[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4622/3909...9831_z.jpg]

Done right? Well...I put the set back on the test bench and it was pretty clear that I broke it.  Icon_problem
It turned out that I didn't pay close enough attention to that Zenith paper cap that I removed. When looking at layers of past repairs it's hard to guess exactly what's going on without tracing everything out - which is what I did next (should've done that to begin with). That Zenith cap was in fact a stand-in for 1/2 of #25 - a dual 0.25uF cap in a metal can. I didn't notice during my initial look through but one of the leads of #25 was clipped off:

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4602/2512...f1c4_z.jpg]
That lead originally went to the middle terminal of #6.

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4748/2512...fe6b_z.jpg]

I restuffed #25 and put it back on the test bench.

[Image: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4763/3996...311a_z.jpg]

The 112 came back to life.  Icon_clap


Messages In This Thread
Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-28-2018, 04:14 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-28-2018, 04:51 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by morzh - 01-28-2018, 05:11 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-28-2018, 11:08 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by gregb - 01-28-2018, 11:40 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by KCMike - 01-28-2018, 11:50 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-30-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-31-2018, 01:26 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-31-2018, 01:49 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-31-2018, 02:24 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Kestas - 01-31-2018, 04:38 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-31-2018, 05:40 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 01-31-2018, 08:50 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-05-2018, 12:08 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-05-2018, 12:30 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Radioroslyn - 02-05-2018, 11:45 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-05-2018, 12:01 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-08-2018, 01:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Ron Ramirez - 02-08-2018, 06:54 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-08-2018, 07:41 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Ron Ramirez - 02-08-2018, 11:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Radioroslyn - 02-08-2018, 01:08 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-08-2018, 01:24 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Steve Davis - 02-09-2018, 02:30 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-09-2018, 02:44 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Radioroslyn - 02-09-2018, 11:01 AM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-19-2018, 09:17 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-19-2018, 09:20 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by morzh - 02-19-2018, 10:21 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by Nathan Slingerland - 02-19-2018, 10:31 PM
RE: Nathan's 112 Highboy - by EdHolland - 02-23-2018, 07:44 AM



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5967 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5966 Guest(s)
Avatar

>