Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED
#14

Hi all,

I too am restoring one of these 37-624 sets. Mine still has the original Philco cap. The part number on it is 30-1271-X. It is marked non-polorized and is 8uf and 2uf at 200VDC. This is just in case the battery is connected backwards. I just purchased some 8.2uf & 2.2 uf film caps for use in this restoration. They are quite large, however if you have an old electrolytic can that is tall enough, you could restuff it with these caps. they are available from AES. Part number for the 8.2uf is C-FS8D2-630 and for the 2.2uf is C-FS2D2-630. I also purchased a 4.7uf for part number C-FS4D7-630 to use with the 8.2uf to restuff the filter cap next to the vibrator p/s. It was a tight fit, but I slightly modified the metal case to get all to fit and stacked them end to end. I just finished repairing and restoring the vibrator power supply and these film caps work great. It puts out 155volts DC with no ripple observed on my scope. These are film caps so polarity is not a problem. I did need to unsolder and pull the end cap off the vibrator and clean the contacts. I used some alcohol and a relay contact burnishing tool to clean the contacts. I then had to slightly tweek one of the contacts to get the square wave equal height and duration. And yes I did restuff the three metal can caps in that p/s as well as the buffer cap. It should now last a long time.
Feel free to email me with any questions.
Gerald D.


Messages In This Thread
RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by harley92 - 02-01-2018, 06:30 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 02-25-2008, 09:28 PM
[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 07:13 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 02-26-2008, 07:59 AM
[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 08:13 AM
[No subject] - by Steve D - 02-26-2008, 12:38 PM
[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 01:06 PM
[No subject] - by davemc - 03-03-2008, 06:07 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 03-03-2008, 11:10 PM
[No subject] - by davemc - 03-14-2008, 05:25 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 03-20-2008, 10:58 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6794 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 6792 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>