Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 44B - Changes or Bad Parts?
#1

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013581.pdf

I am working on a Philco 44B cathedral. Several parts do not match the schematic in Riders. I looked through several Riders volumes (Philco sections) looking for changes pages, as well as searching the internet and the Phorum - but none were found.

For example, the filter choke (part 70) measures 562 ohms. Riders and Radiomuseum says 1750 ohms. I always assumed that such parts are either open or good, and do not change value. Another example: voltage divider 58. Riders says 32 and 235 ohms. Mine measure 24.4 and 257.5 and the values are stable when the terminals are moved. The 24.4 section is -23.75% (the other section is in tolerance). Again, I assumed that wire wound resistors do not normally change values, which is why they were used vs. carbon.

There are 4 flexible wire wound resistors used. One is bad. But the other three do not match the schematic. Part 23 (200 ohms) measures 272.3 ohms. Part 37 (300 ohms) measures 417 ohms. Part 27 (300 ohms) measures 386 ohms. All of these values are stable when the resistor is moved around. I have not removed the sleeves to see how they are actually marked, since unsoldering one end and removing the sleeve would likely destroy the fragile resistor.

Could all of these differences simply be changes, or failure modes I do not understand?


Messages In This Thread
Model 44B - Changes or Bad Parts? - by davemc - 04-08-2018, 05:11 PM
RE: Model 44B - Changes or Bad Parts? - by davemc - 04-09-2018, 07:32 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>