Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Nathan's 37-690X
#34

Thanks Keith! I agree - it's much less nerve wracking to work on a mostly working radio.

Interesting about the limited bass adjustment Mike. I did remove the audio choke and sure enough it is open.

It has wire leads so I took it apart to see if it was just broken where the wires connect. It wasn't - the break must be internal.

The good news is that I found the specs on Part No. 32-7528 in the 1942 Philco Parts Catalog.  Icon_thumbup

   
  • 65H
  • 2,250 ohm (approx the 2,000 labeled on the schematic)
  • 10mA rating
  • 2"H x 1 3/4"W x 1 5/8"D

It has 2 1/4" mounting holes.

What do you guys think of Hammond 155C as a replacement? The specs are:
  • 60H
  • 2,750 ohm
  • 8 mA rating

The current rating is lower (8mA vs 10mA) but the resistance is higher than the original Philco part (2750 ohm vs. 2250 ohm).
So does that mean the max design voltage should be 225V and so 225V / 2750 ohm = 8.18 mA = close enough?


Messages In This Thread
Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:14 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:30 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 02:40 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Kenradio - 08-18-2018, 04:02 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 08:54 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-18-2018, 09:03 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by morzh - 08-18-2018, 10:00 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-19-2018, 01:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690 - by Arran - 08-19-2018, 01:52 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 08-21-2018, 11:39 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-21-2018, 10:09 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-21-2018, 10:52 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 08:09 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 09:17 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Ron Ramirez - 08-22-2018, 09:31 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 11:30 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Radioroslyn - 08-22-2018, 11:31 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-22-2018, 11:33 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-23-2018, 12:12 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-23-2018, 12:30 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 08-23-2018, 08:08 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 08-25-2018, 11:25 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Arran - 08-26-2018, 12:33 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Ron Ramirez - 08-26-2018, 07:59 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-08-2018, 09:10 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 09-08-2018, 11:00 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by GarySP - 09-08-2018, 11:40 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 11:42 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 11:56 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-09-2018, 04:43 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-12-2018, 09:52 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 09-12-2018, 10:35 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by thirtiesradio - 09-13-2018, 01:32 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 10:01 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 09-13-2018, 10:37 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 10:53 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Radioroslyn - 09-13-2018, 11:16 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-13-2018, 11:33 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 09-23-2018, 09:20 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by Nathan Slingerland - 10-06-2018, 09:28 PM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by klondike98 - 10-07-2018, 10:02 AM
RE: Nathan's 37-690X - by morzh - 10-07-2018, 01:37 PM



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>