Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Hippo differences
#7

It's not exactly a mid year change, the code numbers I mean. You see Philco used to design different versions of the same model chassis to accommodate whatever parts they could accumulate from the various suppliers they used. In the post war period there were a number of parts shortages, so some sets, like the Philco 46-1201, could have as many as eight different code numbers, and three or more production run versions, or the same set, swapping everything from tube lineups, to what shape speaker they used. They could swap back and forth between producing different Code numbered versions depending on what parts they could get and what they were running out of.
  I have three Hippo models, one good one, and two project ones, one is more of a parts set. The first one I got has a tuned RF amplifier stage,
and uses a 7A8 octode mixer oscillator, the other two have a 14AF7 twin triode mixer-oscillator, and two IF amplifier tubes. I can't tell you what year these were built because Philco Products of Canada Ltd. used two digit model numbers like the late 1920s and early 30s sets did, rather then a model year prefix like 41-, 46-, etc. But if the Toronto plant was swapping parts around like this you can bet that the U.S plants were.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Philco Hippo differences - by Kestas - 08-15-2018, 10:44 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by morzh - 08-15-2018, 10:45 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Ron Ramirez - 08-15-2018, 07:24 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by David - 08-15-2018, 07:27 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Squire - 08-29-2018, 09:07 PM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Arran - 09-14-2018, 03:56 AM
RE: Philco Hippo differences - by Squire - 09-16-2018, 06:58 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3228 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3227 Guest(s)
Avatar

>