Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Packard Bell 48D re-cap
#19

    I took another look at the IF transformers. The first one has continuity and 15 ohms on both sides, the second one has continuity and 15 ohms on one side, open on the secondary. So I had a Pac Bell parts radio with an IF transformer, 20 ohms on both sides. I jumpered this in after removing the original and for the first time I received a broadcast signal, the strongest station locally. Very, very distorted, not so much that I can't make out the words, and there is a background buzz, maybe the same one I've had all along. Getting the broadcast signal has me excited though.

Before I solder it in, this transformer should be just fine, right? The 48D is IF 460, the loaner model 651 is IF 455. Could be interesting to see what I get if I bypass the open transformer.

Alan


Messages In This Thread
Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-08-2018, 02:42 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-09-2018, 01:55 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by David - 12-09-2018, 02:20 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by morzh - 12-09-2018, 02:24 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-10-2018, 05:16 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by morzh - 12-10-2018, 05:40 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-10-2018, 05:48 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-10-2018, 06:40 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-10-2018, 06:45 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by David - 12-10-2018, 07:21 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-20-2018, 01:04 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by Phlogiston - 12-20-2018, 01:33 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-20-2018, 06:15 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-21-2018, 12:15 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-21-2018, 12:30 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-21-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-21-2018, 12:41 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-24-2018, 04:23 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by David - 12-24-2018, 10:09 PM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by lasurveyor - 12-25-2018, 10:45 AM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by OldRestorer - 12-27-2018, 08:13 AM
RE: Packard Bell 48D re-cap - by jcassity - 12-27-2018, 12:09 PM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Another Update: I found a couple of damaged coils inside this radio that might have something to do with why this radio ...captainclock1988 — 10:51 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
If you are still on 5TPO, you lost me there. What X7? What Points 1 and 2?morzh — 08:37 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Quick progress report: X7 is broken. Only one leg soldered, the other missing and the diode is cracked. I've replaced...R3Sons — 05:05 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Oh...and you have electrolytic caps there. All need to go and be replaced.morzh — 04:36 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Thanks, will do.R3Sons — 01:25 PM
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
UPDATE: I was able to pick up a signal generator on the cheap (amazingly enough) on feebay and I did an IF alignment fol...captainclock1988 — 09:53 AM
Philco 91 Schematic
Hi Rod, The resistor connects to pin 4 and the ungrounded side of block 9. From pin 9 of the RF tube to one side of ...dconant — 09:34 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
I just found your post. I have this exact same model, and have had it since 1985 when I was 15 years old! I performed a ...MuzzcoVW — 09:11 AM
B&K 1077B no video
Hello Tim, I would if it's a leaky Capacitor So are all 3 of those B- voltages low then ? Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:55 AM
B&K 1077B no video
I found a schematic and think I have the problem traced down to the minus power supply. I have very low voltages that go...TV MAN — 12:41 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 8891 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 8889 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>