Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Substitute higher secondary a.c. voltages
#9

Terry ,

The adjusting filter capacitance change is most-interesting.  I didn't know anything about that.
I suppose the simplest route is the added resistance in the dc supply. The filter caps I've bought will handle the extra voltage, ( 450 volts), so I don't think changing them for fear of them being underrated is necessary.   I would assume it best to add the resistance after the field coil.    

Not sure it will be necessary...... I'm trying to buy another transformer from someone on here.  He may have one more-like the original.  there's one on Ebay that's a little high.  I'm not rushing into either choice yet.

I appreciate the help.   Icon_biggrin 

morzh ,

An additional transformer sounds expensive, and a little complicated.  I'll probably stick with resistance if I have to do it at all .  I'm hoping to get a better replacement  from someone I came across after I posted my original post.  Thanks for the suggestion.   Icon_wave 

Tom,
 
Your suggestion of a different rectifier sounds wonderfully the easiest to implement, ( as long as the pin arrangement is the same...not that I'm not capable of re-wiring it).   This thing has an 84 rectifier though, and I'm feeling any newer rectifier ( like the 5Y3),  may go in the other direction. I don't know things like plate resistances, so I need to study that more in the online tube manuals.     Icon_razz


Jake


Messages In This Thread
RE: Substitute higher secondary a.c. voltages - by Jake Blake - 04-05-2019, 08:16 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Nice radio, Mike! Here's hoping it was well rebuilt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 12:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3399 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3398 Guest(s)
Avatar

>