Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 90 Cathedral stopped receiving
#18

Hi John,
Yes, I read about that 0.5meg thru your notes, (Thank You).
So, I opened up the pot, cleaned it, lubed it and re-measured it.
(Oh and by the way, the inside cover of the pot had a date stamp on it of Nov 6th, 1931!)
It is now measuring 2.8 meg ohm across the outer terms. 
From the center term, it does a clean linear measurement from side to side.
Yet, upon re-installing it; I still get noise when I adjust it.
(I put the old original tube in and it still didn't function, so I put the new, (24), replacement tube.)
The radio is still not receiving. 
I know I still have to do a lot of work to do about replacing individual components
I bought 2, a 24 and a 224 together.
The 24 lights up, but not the 224. :-(
Here are the notes from the seller:
One is a National Union NY-224 type 24A vacuum tube, and the other is a Philco type 24.
These tubes tested GOOD on a reliable Hickok Model 800A tube tester (a dynamic mutual conductance tester).     ... and NO shorts or gas detected.
They both had readings of 600 micromhos.  These tube are right at the minimum, but should still be usable. 
Ref:  Minimum readings should be 600 micromhos (60%) and new tubes should test at 1000 or more micromhos. 

Here is my question, based on the reference to the schematic, should I replace the original with a 500K ohm pot?


Attached Files Image(s)
   

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]


Messages In This Thread
RE: Model 90 Cathedral stopped receiving - by zboltman - 08-29-2020, 07:05 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron I forgot, but when you said "phone number", I remembered, caus I usually remember how I act when I need...morzh — 11:12 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
You have an extensive collection of Philcos, Mike! I’m always excited to see each new one. Agreed on the power supply fu...jrblasde — 10:50 AM
462ron
Hi Mike, that 84 sure looks great. You don’t often see these antique radios with a fuse like yours has. I usually instal...462ron — 10:22 AM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, Wow ! far as my AK it does work and the cabinet is in nice shape so is my chassis anyway here is a photo of...radiorich — 02:59 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>