Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Can I just align an AA5 by ear?
#6

Adding to the noise Icon_smile A while back on a different forum someone posted a very good, albeit lengthy, tutorial about how to sneak by without springing for $20-30 on a signal generator. Like Nash indicates, the first step is to get the IF to the correct frequency or else you're just shooting in the dark. The tutorial explained how to tune in a station and then listen on a second radio to observe if the local oscillator signal could be heard 455 kc higher on radio #2. If you understand the fundamentals of a superhet you can see how this can work but its probably bad advice to a first-timer. Icon_crazy

Its easier to spring for a signal generator. Nowadays with digital radios available for next to nothing a fellow can take a cheapo hobby generator and calibrate it well with a few pencil marks on the dial! Probably better calibration than the old radiomen had at their disposal.

And...the nature of the old beasts is that some of them (the cheap home radios) don't track that well anymore and I sometimes wonder if they ever did? BTW, the term " tracking" refers to the relationship between the RF section and local oscillator section...not just where the signal appears on the dial. Sometimes its a compromise.


Messages In This Thread
Can I just align an AA5 by ear? - by regel_1999 - 03-27-2011, 11:31 AM
Re: Can I just align an AA5 by ear? - by nash - 04-05-2011, 03:44 PM
Re: Can I just align an AA5 by ear? - by exray - 04-05-2011, 06:43 PM
Re: Can I just align an AA5 by ear? - by w4rtc - 04-06-2011, 10:37 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>