Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Magnetic tuning question.
#20

Mikethedruid,

You need to understand that AM is much more complicated than just varying the strength of a carrier wave. There's lots of math involved, much of which even I have trouble with. The short story is, all information in AM is carried in the sidebands, and there is a direct mathematical correlation between the audio bandwidth (frequency response) and the width of those sidebands. If you only want 4 KHz of audio bandwidth, you only need 8 KHz modulation bandwidth (say, you have a carrier on 1000 KHz, you would have sidebands out to 996 and 1004 KHz.) For more audio bandwidth, you need correspondingly more modulation bandwidth. For a 10 KHz audio bandwidth, you would create sidebands out to 990 and 1010 KHz. You can't get something for nothing.

FM is complex in a different way. To get a 15 KHz audio bandwidth on FM, you COULD use 15 KHz deviation either side of the carrier (30 KHz total), but this gives limited signal to noise ratio, so for broadcast purposes, a deviation of 75 KHz either side of the carrier (150 KHz total) was chosen. In this case, the audio bandwidth remains the same, but other information is placed onto the carrier at certain frequencies and deviation levels (like the 19 KHz pilot subcarrier and the 38 KHz L-R subcarrier) and allows for a "louder" modulation with better signal to noise ratio.

Digital (IBOC, or as I call it, I-BLOCK in the US) is another whole kettle of fish. It use fixed sidebands with neither AM nor FM modulation, but Pulse Width Modulation and a codec that allows for information other than the L+R modulation of a standard AM signal. These include a L-R and metadata information.


Messages In This Thread
Magnetic tuning question. - by poulsbobill - 09-22-2021, 12:23 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by vinzer - 09-22-2021, 01:29 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by morzh - 09-22-2021, 07:38 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-22-2021, 09:20 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by poulsbobill - 09-23-2021, 01:42 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by morzh - 09-23-2021, 08:33 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by Ron Ramirez - 09-23-2021, 10:59 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by poulsbobill - 09-24-2021, 02:09 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-24-2021, 03:27 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by BrendaAnnD - 09-24-2021, 03:34 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-24-2021, 07:47 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-24-2021, 08:54 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by BrendaAnnD - 09-24-2021, 09:37 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-24-2021, 10:06 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by morzh - 09-24-2021, 10:15 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by poulsbobill - 09-24-2021, 10:28 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by morzh - 09-24-2021, 11:49 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by BrendaAnnD - 09-25-2021, 04:17 AM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by mikethedruid - 09-25-2021, 10:56 AM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by BrendaAnnD - 09-25-2021, 12:53 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-25-2021, 01:07 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by mikethedruid - 09-25-2021, 04:43 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by rfeenstra - 09-25-2021, 05:30 PM
RE: Magnetic tuning question. - by morzh - 09-25-2021, 08:18 PM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 49-1040
Hello bob, that underside looks like it is all original ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM
Philco 49-1040
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes. The cutout is for the speaker.  Here's a photo from a different set. Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM
Philco 49-1040
Bob; Looks like another "Bumble Bee" special, like my Brand Z T.O radios. Is that section they took out of ...Arran — 12:19 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello Bob, You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, Lookup  murrayatuptown on ARF. Seems he has a dilemma with surplus field coils. Could get lucky and have what y...Chas — 01:26 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello Mike, I have not checked to see if my console has a fuse or not and far as sets go I have early 30s General Motor...radiorich — 11:25 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4037 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 4035 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>