Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

First attempt at rewinding an oscillator coil (Phil 38-12)
#13

TESTS ATTEMPTED TODAY (MAY 11)

Several of you have suggested these different tests on this non-working Philco radio to see if osc. coil is working. Here is what I tried today and the results;

#1 Set Philco at roughly 1000 kHz and tune a good radio 455 (470 since it is IF on this one) above and below the frequency on Philco. If you hear the squal osc is working.
Results; With Philco set @ 1000, I get a squawl/squeal on good radio at about 1200 kHz and about 610-620 kHz. Not loud but I hear it. I hear no broadcast anywhere.

#2 Set good radio to a clear spot about 1200 kHz and tune the Philco up and down the dial. Faint whistle indicates the radio's osc is working.
Results; I hear nothing today and I hear no broadcast anywhere.

#3 Set Philco @ 550 kHz and place ant wire near 6A7 tube and it should be heard at 1020 kHz.
Results; I hear nothing & I hear no broadcast anywhere.

Other anecdotal notes. A faint station on the good radio gets noticably stronger when I connect ext. antenna to Philco (this was @ about 1300 kHz.) I also hear the static noise on good radio when I connect the Philco ext. antenna.

When I touch ext antenna wire to Philco 6A7 grid cap, I hear static in the Philco speaker and also in the good radio.

Is it possible I rewound the osc coil the wrong direction? Should I try unsoldering the wires and reverse them---#1 post to #2 post and vice versa? Starting to get a little frustrated to say the least.

Thanks for all your good help.
Art


Messages In This Thread
Re: First attempt at rewinding an oscillator coil (Phil 38-1 - by Art Hoch - 05-11-2011, 05:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>