Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Your expierience in $$ for DIY restoration? Newbie w/41-608
#2

Hi, and welcome!

If you do the work yourself, you can spend between $10-30 in capacitors and resistors to restore a radio. Tubes, when needed, add more to the tab. However, more often than not, most if not all of the tubes in an old radio are still good. It is the failure of capacitors that causes most of the problems in old radios.

As you can see, the cost of parts themselves is not expensive. But your time and effort in repairing the set adds up fast. Not to mention the fact that your 41-608's chassis is full of wires that have rubber insulation. This rubber dries out and falls off over time, and therefore needs to be replaced for safety and reliability. So now you're spending more money on either wires to replace every wire, or heat shrink tubing to use as sleeves over every old rubber-covered wire in the set (the method I prefer).

This operation adds even more time to your restoration.

So (and I'm not sure if this is what you are asking, but I'll provide this bit of info anyway just for fun), if someone wants to charge you $200-400 to rebuild the chassis of that 41-608, they aren't trying to rip you off - they are actually being fair both to you, and to themselves. Doing this type of work the right way takes a lot of time, but the end result is worth it.

I should point out that I noticed your 41-608 still has its original record changer, but the main tone arm is missing - only the optional record cutter arm is in place. The record cutter was used to actually make home recordings of 78 rpm records. But, the playback arm is missing. This may be a hard part to find. You might try asking West-Tech Services if they have one for sale.

http://www.west-techservices.com/

At any rate, enjoy your new find! And feel free to ask questions as you go along - that is what we are here for.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN





Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>