Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco model 511
#16

Ron Ramirez Wrote:Well, I looked at the schematic of the Kolster K-27. At first, it appears that the Kolster transformer would substitute for the Philco 511 transformer.

But it won't. Why?

Notice the Kolster transformer's high voltage winding is 600 VCT (300-0-300).

After some searching, I finally found the Philco's ratings. Its high voltage winding is only 375 VCT (187.5-0-187.5).

To use the Kolster transformer would make the B+ run too high throughout the Philco, and would likely cause the B+ on the 71A plate to exceed its design ratings (180 volts max.


You can do what you wish, but I personally would not do it.

Here are rough specifications for the Philco transformer. I can't guarantee the current specification of the high voltage secondary is correct, but 60 mA is greater than the total plate current draw of the entire set which according to Bulletin 5 adds up to just over 34 mA. Bulletin 5 specifies "30 mA per plate" on the plates of the 80 rectifier. Therefore, 60 mA was selected as a nice round figure. Anyone is, of course, welcome to add their two cents' worth to this. The filament currents were obtained from a tube manual - the 1.5V filament current is equal to the total filament current draw of four 26 tubes.

Primary - 125 volts AC, tapped at roughly 110
Secondary #1: 375 VCT (187.5-0-187.5), looks like 60 mA
Secondary #2 (26 tubes): 1.5V, 4.2A
Secondary #3 (27): 2.5V, 1.75A
Secondary #4 (71A): 5VCT, 0.75 to 1A? (0.5A for 71A tube plus additional current of pilot lamp)
Secondary #5 (80): 5V, 2A


Hi Ron,

Ok, I will take your advice and not use the Kolster transformer.
I will just wait until I have enough money to get the transformer rewound.
By the way, do you know where I can get a Philco model 86 junker set?
Please let me know what you can do to put the word out and I will be
thanking you for what help you can offer.

Sincerely,
Radionut


Messages In This Thread
Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-14-2011, 02:42 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by 7estatdef - 08-15-2011, 07:33 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-15-2011, 10:16 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by 7estatdef - 08-15-2011, 10:24 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by codefox1 - 08-15-2011, 10:40 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-16-2011, 12:18 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-16-2011, 12:22 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-16-2011, 07:58 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by 7estatdef - 08-16-2011, 06:39 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by gvel - 08-16-2011, 08:34 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-18-2011, 06:11 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-18-2011, 07:47 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-21-2011, 05:40 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by codefox1 - 08-21-2011, 05:52 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-21-2011, 07:45 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-22-2011, 03:12 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by 7estatdef - 08-22-2011, 03:15 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-22-2011, 03:30 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by 7estatdef - 08-22-2011, 03:56 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-22-2011, 03:58 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Eliot Ness - 08-22-2011, 05:37 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-23-2011, 03:29 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-24-2011, 03:16 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 08-30-2011, 11:27 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Arran - 08-30-2011, 11:46 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-31-2011, 11:05 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 09-12-2011, 02:06 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 09-12-2011, 10:37 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by TA Forbes - 09-12-2011, 09:21 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 09-12-2011, 11:33 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by radionut1929 - 10-28-2011, 12:21 AM
Re: Philco model 511 - by jerryhawthorne - 10-30-2011, 01:26 PM
Re: Philco model 511 - by Ron Ramirez - 10-31-2011, 06:57 PM



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>