Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 71 restoration
#20

I made some progress tonight. Some of the resistors I left in were actually way high in value 30-50% high. I swapped the resistors out and put the volume control back in and powered it up. At first I got nothing but that annoying crackling in the speaker which was controlable with the volume control which told me that the output was working.

I started probing around with my tracer on RF and got RF on the RF tube, OSC and IF tubes no audio anywhere. I could hear the crackling in my tracer also. Then I touched the cathode of the 36 again and I heard a loud buzz in the speaker then it started to receive stations. Maybe touching that kick started the OSC? It plays ok has lots of noise (static) and the sound completly drops out every now and then and I can then touch the grip cap of the 36 tube and it starts playing again. 36 tube gone wonky? It tested good.

When it is playing it goes dead when tuned lower then mid 900's (550 - about 940 or so) just get a strange buzzing noise.

Still havent checked voltages ill do that tomorrow. Another wierd thing I noticed when the radio was playing I could not tune another radio to hear the OSC running. It had to be running if its tuning in stations so whats up with that?

Issues still working through:
1. Crackling sound
2. Sound droping out and no audio on tubes until 36 tube pins touched
3. Lots of static when radio is playing
4. cant tune lower then ~940 on the dial.

-Keith


Messages In This Thread
Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 09-29-2011, 12:48 AM
RE: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 03-02-2012, 06:09 PM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by ipwizard - 09-29-2011, 01:36 AM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by ipwizard - 09-29-2011, 10:14 PM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by ipwizard - 10-06-2011, 12:29 AM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by Arran - 10-06-2011, 02:24 AM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by rghines1 - 10-06-2011, 10:20 AM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by exray - 10-06-2011, 12:41 PM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by ipwizard - 10-08-2011, 10:34 PM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by Marsupial - 10-08-2011, 11:52 PM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by exray - 10-09-2011, 05:56 AM
Re: Man this thing is a nightmare - by ipwizard - 10-10-2011, 01:40 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 10-31-2011, 05:10 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 10-31-2011, 08:48 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 10-31-2011, 09:00 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-01-2011, 01:03 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-01-2011, 01:06 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 11-01-2011, 10:58 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-03-2011, 01:03 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 11-03-2011, 02:59 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by codefox1 - 11-03-2011, 10:04 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-03-2011, 06:00 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 11-03-2011, 06:26 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-03-2011, 06:31 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 11-03-2011, 06:42 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-03-2011, 07:40 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by 7estatdef - 11-03-2011, 08:39 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-03-2011, 09:38 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-04-2011, 12:29 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-04-2011, 02:33 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 11-30-2011, 11:56 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by TA Forbes - 12-01-2011, 12:37 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by TA Forbes - 12-02-2011, 09:54 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by codefox1 - 12-03-2011, 11:48 AM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 12-04-2011, 03:03 PM
Re: Philco 71 restoration - by ipwizard - 12-23-2011, 04:36 AM



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 7103 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 7101 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>