Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

no reception 57C
#3

I'm thinking it could be a coil problem - either the antenna or oscillator coil, or both, have gone bad. Common ailment in 1928-1936 Philco sets. If the set has been recapped and if going through it reveals that all connections were made properly according to the schematic, then the coils would be the next thing to look at - assuming, of course, that the tubes are good.

You got a bargain on that 57C. These, and the lookalike 54C, usually sell for $60-80 and up on eBay. I don't know what the appeal is, but people seem to really like these little sets. I recently acquired an empty 57C cabinet; I have a poor 57C chassis with no power transformer, missing a tube socket, and missing its original speaker. Now the challenge is to acquire these parts and try to turn this parts chassis back into a working chassis.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
no reception 57C - by kbm37-630 - 11-12-2011, 08:43 PM
Re: no reception 57C - by Ron Ramirez - 11-13-2011, 07:30 AM
Re: no reception 57C - by Ron Ramirez - 11-13-2011, 07:33 AM
Re: no reception 57C - by kbm37-630 - 11-13-2011, 01:44 PM
Re: no reception 57C - by 7estatdef - 11-14-2011, 06:37 PM
Re: no reception 57C - by kbm37-630 - 11-19-2011, 10:50 AM
Re: no reception 57C - by gvel - 11-20-2011, 10:51 AM
Re: no reception 57C - by 7estatdef - 11-20-2011, 03:34 PM
Re: no reception 57C - by kbm37-630 - 11-20-2011, 06:16 PM
Re: no reception 57C - by 7estatdef - 11-21-2011, 02:09 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5563 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5562 Guest(s)
Avatar

>