Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The 37-650 from H**l
#10

I wonder why these Philco sub chassis have so much trouble? It can't be just the fact that it's an RF sub chassis, there were RCA and Northern Electric/American Bosch sets that used similar things and I've never heard a complaint about the RCA sets. On thing that I have noticed about Philcos is they seem to have a lot of front end problems regardless of the chassis layout. Maybe they cheapened out on components where they shouldn't have? I know that in one set I have from the 1940s they used brass plated steel in the IF trimmer screws rather then brass, and that sets like the Philco 60s have corroded coil problems thanks to the plastic insulation they used. David Grimes manufactured sets under his own name back in the 1920s and they weren't particularly anything to write home about.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
The 37-650 from H**l - by Ron Ramirez - 12-30-2011, 07:43 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Glenn Roberts - 12-30-2011, 07:56 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by TA Forbes - 12-30-2011, 09:52 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by 7estatdef - 12-30-2011, 10:47 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Ron Ramirez - 12-30-2011, 11:28 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by BDM - 12-31-2011, 01:01 AM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Chuck Schwark - 12-31-2011, 05:39 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Steve Davis - 12-31-2011, 06:46 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Texasrocker - 12-31-2011, 11:21 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by Arran - 01-02-2012, 11:59 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by TA Forbes - 01-03-2012, 03:19 PM
Re: The 37-650 from h**l - by TA Forbes - 01-03-2012, 03:22 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>