1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Linear Mode
finally beginning 118
joejoe
Junior Member
**
Posts: 26
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2011
City: Eagle, State, Province, Country: ID
#24

01-12-2012, 02:31 PM
Hi Glenn,

I am finally back to working on this 118. I have some parts and started rewiring the chassis. After a few minutes I ran into a problem. According to the schematic, I have, the center tap, of the detector transformer, part 12, goes to part 17, a .05 ufd cap. Could this right? I believe that the center tap, of part 12, should go to the junction of parts 10 (70K ohm) and part 15 (2 megohm) and also the .05 ufd cap.

Glenn, could you check to see if the center tap of part 12 (Xformer) goes to part 10 (70K ohm), part 15 (2Megohm) and part 17 (.05 ufd).

Thanks Glenn Icon_wave
Find
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Thread Closed


Messages In This Thread
finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 01:12 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-16-2012, 03:56 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-17-2012, 08:18 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-17-2012, 11:11 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-18-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-18-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-20-2012, 07:13 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-20-2012, 07:42 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-20-2012, 08:07 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 12:43 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 12:46 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-21-2012, 12:51 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 01:02 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by 7estatdef - 06-21-2012, 04:05 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-21-2012, 04:18 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-23-2012, 08:43 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-24-2012, 07:29 AM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-24-2012, 12:29 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by ipwizard - 10-03-2011, 01:26 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 01:28 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by codefox1 - 10-03-2011, 02:22 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 02:26 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 10-03-2011, 10:57 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-04-2011, 04:02 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Arran - 10-06-2011, 09:03 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-07-2011, 04:02 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Arran - 10-08-2011, 01:08 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-08-2011, 04:17 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-12-2011, 06:10 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-02-2011, 09:15 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-02-2011, 09:19 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-03-2011, 08:19 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Chuck Schwark - 11-03-2011, 01:54 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-03-2011, 05:22 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-03-2011, 05:41 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-04-2011, 08:55 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 12-07-2011, 02:11 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 12-07-2011, 03:24 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 12-07-2011, 08:44 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 12-23-2011, 04:11 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-12-2012, 02:31 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-12-2012, 02:47 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-12-2012, 05:00 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-12-2012, 05:03 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-23-2012, 04:06 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-23-2012, 05:43 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-23-2012, 06:41 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-23-2012, 07:40 PM



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>
  1. The PHILCO Phorum
  2. Philco Radio Discussions
  3. Philco Electronic Restoration