Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

finally beginning 118
#25

Hi JoeJoe,

I found quite a few deviations from the schematic so I will try my hand at using paint shop to highlight the wires and part numbers you are questioning.

OK here is a link to the picture I took, I wanted you to be able to zoom in and didn't want to clutter up Ron's Phorum Icon_lol

http://www.flickr.com/photos/56089156@N0...842118219/

There is a .05 cap going from the center tap to ground there is also a connection to the series of resistors and cap you were asking about too. It doesn't go to #4 like the schematic shows. FYI, I acquired another 118 chassis for parts and it is connected the exact same way. It didn't have the shunt resistor either,, and the Shadowmeter coil was open on it too... Icon_sad . I guess I just need to rewind the coil, no getting around it.

Glenn


Messages In This Thread
finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 01:12 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-16-2012, 03:56 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-17-2012, 08:18 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-17-2012, 11:11 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-18-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-18-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-20-2012, 07:13 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-20-2012, 07:42 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-20-2012, 08:07 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 12:43 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 12:46 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-21-2012, 12:51 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-21-2012, 01:02 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by 7estatdef - 06-21-2012, 04:05 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-21-2012, 04:18 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 06-23-2012, 08:43 PM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-24-2012, 07:29 AM
RE: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 06-24-2012, 12:29 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by ipwizard - 10-03-2011, 01:26 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 01:28 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by codefox1 - 10-03-2011, 02:22 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-03-2011, 02:26 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by TA Forbes - 10-03-2011, 10:57 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-04-2011, 04:02 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Arran - 10-06-2011, 09:03 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-07-2011, 04:02 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Arran - 10-08-2011, 01:08 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-08-2011, 04:17 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 10-12-2011, 06:10 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-02-2011, 09:15 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-02-2011, 09:19 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-03-2011, 08:19 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Chuck Schwark - 11-03-2011, 01:54 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-03-2011, 05:22 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 11-03-2011, 05:41 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by PhilcoMike - 11-04-2011, 08:55 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 12-07-2011, 02:11 AM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 12-07-2011, 03:24 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 12-07-2011, 08:44 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 12-23-2011, 04:11 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-12-2012, 02:31 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-12-2012, 02:47 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-12-2012, 05:00 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-12-2012, 05:03 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-23-2012, 04:06 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-23-2012, 05:43 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by joejoe - 01-23-2012, 06:41 PM
Re: finally beginning 118 - by Glenn Roberts - 01-23-2012, 07:40 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>