Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-660
#4

Hello, Marv: I just happen to be working on a 37-660 right now, which is very similar to your 665.

Caps #60 and #68 are .003mFd, 1000V rated caps. Rather than take a chance with my poly 630V caps, I ordered some .0033/1600V replacements. I don't think you need to go any higher than 1000V, but the 1600Vs were available to me so I went with them.

The rest of your paper caps should be fine replaced by the 600/630V varieties offered by many vendors. Your electrolytics should be fine replaced by 450V varieties. NOTE that in addition to the two 8mFd electrolytics located near the power transformer, you also have a small electrolytic can on the RF deck that houses 1, 2, and 3mFd caps. I strongly recommend you replace these, as all 3 are in contact with B+.

In order to replace the can and the paper caps in/on the RF deck you will have to remove the deck to get at them. This is not a simple task. Make sure you diagram and mark the wires as you de-solder them.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-02-2012, 04:56 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by Chuck Schwark - 03-02-2012, 05:10 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by 7estatdef - 03-02-2012, 05:41 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by TA Forbes - 03-02-2012, 06:15 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by Arran - 03-03-2012, 12:28 AM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-02-2012, 08:17 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-02-2012, 09:09 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-03-2012, 04:17 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-03-2012, 05:40 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by Ron Ramirez - 03-04-2012, 08:31 AM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by Texasrocker - 03-04-2012, 02:56 AM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-14-2012, 04:29 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by rghines1 - 03-14-2012, 08:24 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by marv - 03-14-2012, 08:50 PM
RE: Philco 37-660 - by codefox1 - 03-15-2012, 01:31 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 7482 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 7479 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>