Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

48-200 mystery capacitor
#14

Here is another questions for those out in radio land.

It seems to me that in many cases, the radio I am working on, and the schematic don't agree.

(A) For example the schematic may say that a capacitor attaches to pin 2 but on the radio it is pin 3.

(B) The schematic says that the electrolytic caps should be 20 25 30, but the cap in the radio is 10 20 30.

I know in some case for (A) one of the leads may attach to B- so it may be that there are many options for this, and in (B) case, the radio has been repaired so they may have substituted.

My question is, when I encounter a difference between the radio and the schematic which should I use. I don't have enough or ANY real electronic experience to make an educated guess about differences in pin numbers. My gut tells me, to put it back together the way the radio is presently wired.

Any thoughts ?


Messages In This Thread
48-200 mystery capacitor - by winkydink - 03-05-2012, 08:24 AM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by John R - 03-05-2012, 12:33 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by winkydink - 03-05-2012, 01:13 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by winkydink - 03-06-2012, 05:24 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by planigan - 03-06-2012, 06:00 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by codefox1 - 03-06-2012, 06:14 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by Ron Ramirez - 03-06-2012, 06:35 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by Steve Davis - 03-06-2012, 07:54 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by planigan - 03-07-2012, 12:53 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by Steve Davis - 03-07-2012, 02:42 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by Ron Ramirez - 03-07-2012, 07:46 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by planigan - 03-07-2012, 09:14 PM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by winkydink - 03-08-2012, 10:43 AM
RE: 48-200 mystery capacitor - by winkydink - 03-08-2012, 11:57 AM



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>