RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps?

Register

Guest Join Us

Hello Guest,

Please feel free to join us!
There are many more parts of the Phorum that only members can see.

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps?

Pepperoni
Member

Posts: 160
Threads: 42
Joined: Apr 2011
City: New Port Richey State, Province, Country: Florida

#9

03-29-2012, 07:08 PM

Thanks guys! Got it.

I pulled the schematic from philcoradio.com on this Philco 90 with all of the component values added. My Philco 90 (single 47 output) has a 250K volume pot in it and the part number 5366 is on the volume control which matches the parts list. But the schematic calls out a .5 meg pot. Is this a discrepancy on the edited schematic or is my volume pot not functioning properly? It seems to be functioning properly with my Fluke 179 hooked up to the CT and each leg but reads 250K across it.

Pepper

"It's Nice To Be Nice To The Nice"
Major Frank Burns Mash 4077th

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-25-2012, 11:35 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by TA Forbes - 03-25-2012, 11:53 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-26-2012, 12:35 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Chuck Schwark - 03-26-2012, 01:52 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-27-2012, 12:22 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-28-2012, 11:51 AM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Chuck Schwark - 03-28-2012, 01:07 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Ron Ramirez - 03-28-2012, 03:55 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-29-2012, 07:08 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Chuck Schwark - 03-29-2012, 10:40 PM

RE: RE-Stuffing Model 90 Tone Caps? - by Pepperoni - 03-31-2012, 03:19 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G 10-1/2" 65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H 10-1/2" 77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth! I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example! Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

Who's Online

There are currently 7489 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 7486 Guest(s)