Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-116 Question
#4

(04-08-2012, 07:37 AM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  Oh yes, there was a 38-116 Code 121...it used the RF deck leftover from the 37-116/37-675/37-690 production.

The 38-116 Code 125 (as well as the 38-690 Code 125) use a different RF unit with fewer trimmers.

It could very well be that Philco put a few too many Code 121 labels on their cabinets. That is, they ran out of Code 121 chassis before they thought they would and began installing Code 125 chassis into cabinets that may have still had a Code 121 label. It wouldn't be the first time Philco made an error in labeling.

The blue labels you speak of were usually in the cabinets from 1937 on, but were still occasionally found on the chassis. Between 1935 and 1936 they were on the chassis. In 1934 and prior, they used gold labels placed on the chassis. And to make things more confusing, Philco continued to use gold labels through the 1936 season on sets such as the 60 and 89.

Thanks Ron. That makes sense as I have seen the blue labels on my older sets and have a 60 with the gold one.

The guy I bought this from had it in the basement for a long time. Fortunately there is very little rust and it cleaned up well yesterday. Hopefully the cabinet will finish well, it has a little water damage on the bottom. I notice that someone pulled a few of the tube bases to put a couple of metal tubes in. This must have been fairly common as I have another 38-116 which has several bases removed. My 38-690 also has one removed and a GT in its place.

Is there a good source for these bases? Thats the only thing lacking originality.


Messages In This Thread
38-116 Question - by SteveJB - 04-07-2012, 10:27 AM
RE: 38-116 Question - by 7estatdef - 04-07-2012, 10:34 PM
RE: 38-116 Question - by Ron Ramirez - 04-08-2012, 07:37 AM
RE: 38-116 Question - by SteveJB - 04-08-2012, 08:33 PM
RE: 38-116 Question - by 7estatdef - 04-08-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: 38-116 Question - by SteveJB - 04-08-2012, 11:37 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 60
>>and found that the field coil is bad. Should be 1140 ohms, tests at 1.1k ohms. You have one stringent crit...morzh — 02:07 PM
Philco model 60
Yes I was there. I got some real bargains there. Plus a Zenith 7G605 clipper that I have been trying to find for a fair ...Radios1340 — 01:46 PM
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6892 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6891 Guest(s)
Avatar

>