Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-361
#10

OK Chuck

Looking at the 37-61 schematic...I see three electrolytics.

The input filter, (44) on the schematic, connects differently from the other two in that the negative does not connect to ground - it connects to B- at the center tap of the high voltage secondary. The negative leads of the other two electrolytics (42) and (20) connect to ground.

The positive lead of (44) connects to the junction of one of the 5Y4G filament terminals, one leg of resistor (19), and the green-white-tracer lead of the speaker field coil.

The positive lead of (42) connects into the set's B+ distribution line by way of the other side of the speaker field coil and the white lead of the audio output transformer.

The positive lead of (20) connects to the junction of resistors (13) and (19).

If the electrolytics mounted where (44) and (42) were originally placed have multiple wires coming out of them, then they are not the original cans.

Hope this helps.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 37-161 - by cmhsr - 04-20-2012, 03:49 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-20-2012, 07:52 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by cmhsr - 04-20-2012, 07:54 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-20-2012, 07:56 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-23-2012, 08:35 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-23-2012, 09:13 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 05:26 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 08:21 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 08:34 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 06:55 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 07:30 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 07:50 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 09:06 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 09:51 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-25-2012, 09:31 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-27-2012, 06:39 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-27-2012, 08:45 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-28-2012, 09:03 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-28-2012, 06:50 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-29-2012, 02:06 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 04:23 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 04:29 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-01-2012, 03:40 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by John R - 05-01-2012, 04:51 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-01-2012, 06:58 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-11-2012, 10:08 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-11-2012, 10:40 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-23-2012, 06:06 PM
Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-23-2012, 07:36 PM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>