Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 37-361
#24

(04-29-2012, 04:23 PM)cmhsr Wrote:  
(04-29-2012, 02:06 PM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  How did you connect (20)? No, it should not be hot at all. It sounds like you may have (20) backwards? That would not only cause the hum, but if connected backwards, that cap would not only get hot, it will explode sooner or later.

The positive lead goes to the junction of resistors (13), ( 18 ) and (19) plus a couple other connections - see schematic; the negative lead goes to chassis ground. If it has been connected backwards, it is ruined and must be replaced.

Ron number is fine it's number 44 that gets warm. I am getting one station but poorly.

Sorry number 20 is fine it's Cap 44.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 37-161 - by cmhsr - 04-20-2012, 03:49 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-20-2012, 07:52 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by cmhsr - 04-20-2012, 07:54 PM
RE: Philco 37-161 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-20-2012, 07:56 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-23-2012, 08:35 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-23-2012, 09:13 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 05:26 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 08:21 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 08:34 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 06:55 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 07:30 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 07:50 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-24-2012, 09:06 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-24-2012, 09:51 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-25-2012, 09:31 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-27-2012, 06:39 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-27-2012, 08:45 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-28-2012, 09:03 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-28-2012, 06:50 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by Ron Ramirez - 04-29-2012, 02:06 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 04:23 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-29-2012, 04:29 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-01-2012, 03:40 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by John R - 05-01-2012, 04:51 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-01-2012, 06:58 PM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-11-2012, 10:08 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-11-2012, 10:40 AM
RE: Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 05-23-2012, 06:06 PM
Philco 37-361 - by cmhsr - 04-23-2012, 07:36 PM



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>