Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38 116 low volume after recapp
#10

All the resirtors were in spec or replaced. The trans had six pins, three on each side. I did check the transformer for continuity, but its hard to match up pins to the schematic as there are six pins and a lot of wires. I do get 400 ohms on one side of it (right bottom and right middle pins of the trans). I am prerry sure this is primary based on connections. It should be 400 ohms, so it checks.

From either 10 k resistor/trans connection (parts 100 and 101) I get a 160 and 179 ohm reading which is correct though I cant completely make out the other pins. Form the top left pin (one side of a 10K to the middle pin on the left side I get 179 ohms), the schematic calls for 175. From the other 10k resistor/trans connection I get 160 ohms (top right pin to left side bottom pin on trans), it should be 150.

I do not get voltage on either side of 100, 101 or the junction of 115/116. No voltage on pins 5 of the 6L6 either. I am measuring from chassis ground to the pins/connection points here.

Thanks for all your help. I really want to get this playing. I am refinishing the cabinet now!

Steve


Messages In This Thread
38 116 low volume after recapp - by SteveJB - 06-07-2012, 03:03 PM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by rghines1 - 06-07-2012, 03:58 PM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by 7estatdef - 06-07-2012, 09:14 PM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by SteveJB - 06-07-2012, 09:42 PM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by 7estatdef - 06-08-2012, 06:54 AM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by SteveJB - 06-08-2012, 10:17 AM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by codefox1 - 06-08-2012, 11:09 AM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by SteveJB - 06-08-2012, 11:34 AM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by rghines1 - 06-08-2012, 04:41 PM
RE: 38 116 low volume after recapp - by SteveJB - 07-17-2012, 06:39 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>