Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Next project-another 66!
#9

I believe we had the same case of missing dot here in this forum, from exact same cap, a couple of months ago.
There SHOULD be a tiedot between the wire from the right #50 8uF cap to #28 resistor, and the crossing wire from the top side of the field coil and left bottom pin of the output xfmr.

If you did not wire the cap after recapping back when it was, this can be the reason of your squealing, you have a positive feedback and ocillation using xfmr and the tone control caps as resonant tank, turning the output stage into an oscillator. Actually this is why I asked about this cap after your question about squealing. So I would check this before changing value of that 0.002uF cap.

If the cap is there, then it is something else.


Messages In This Thread
Next project-another 66! - by jph14 - 07-05-2012, 02:55 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by Steve Davis - 07-05-2012, 04:49 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by 7estatdef - 07-05-2012, 06:08 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by morzh - 07-05-2012, 08:25 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by TA Forbes - 07-06-2012, 01:18 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by codefox1 - 07-06-2012, 04:36 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by jph14 - 07-06-2012, 06:46 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by 7estatdef - 07-06-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by morzh - 07-06-2012, 07:46 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by jph14 - 07-09-2012, 05:26 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by jph14 - 07-26-2012, 02:22 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by 7estatdef - 07-26-2012, 07:57 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by jerryhawthorne - 07-28-2012, 07:00 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by jph14 - 08-09-2012, 05:26 PM
RE: Next project-another 66! - by 7estatdef - 08-09-2012, 06:59 PM



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>