Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Alignment question
#4

Glad to hear you will fix your signal generator. I'm sure my old rellic was properly aligned when it left the factory in 1956, but has drifted a bit since then.

Oddly enough even a cheap digital frequency counter will get your signal spot on, or close enough for radio work. I have an ancient Hickok digital model, probably from the 70/s, paid $20 delivered on Epay. Again check your frequency with modulation off. Then turn it back on and proceed. Old signal generators become stable as they will get after being on for a half hour or so. So make it so.


Yes, you will have less output as you reduce signal. Point being you don't want to much interaction of AVC line. So long as you have a readable voltage, you can peak. the IF's and later on the RF section. Sometimes this is an iterative process, i.e. go through a couple of times, depending on a possible golden screwdriver job done in the past. If not, usually not more than half turn to make it right. Also beware of harmonics, they will be all over the place, but once set right should be strongest on the IF frequency the set was designed for. VTVM is ideal for this kind of work. Digital meters are torture!


Messages In This Thread
Alignment question - by dsligar - 07-06-2012, 10:42 PM
RE: Alignment question - by codefox1 - 07-06-2012, 11:23 PM
RE: Alignment question - by dsligar - 07-07-2012, 02:12 PM
RE: Alignment question - by codefox1 - 07-07-2012, 03:28 PM
RE: Alignment question - by dsligar - 07-08-2012, 08:34 PM
RE: Alignment question - by Ron Ramirez - 07-08-2012, 09:04 PM
RE: Alignment question - by codefox1 - 07-08-2012, 09:52 PM
RE: Alignment question - by dsligar - 07-10-2012, 01:10 PM
RE: Alignment question - by 7estatdef - 07-10-2012, 07:22 PM
RE: Alignment question - by jerryhawthorne - 07-13-2012, 06:30 PM
RE: Alignment question - by codefox1 - 07-13-2012, 09:21 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>