Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tube Testing - 46-200
#6

Unfortunately this is a case of buyer beware. The listing for the radio was not representative of what I actually recieved, but that being said, physically, the radio is in excellent shape.

I have order the proper tubes for the radio and will replace incorrect or weak tubes.

My next problem is the fact that the inside of the case DOES NOT HAVE the loop antenna. I have another 46-200 and a 48-200 with the loop antenna intact but this radio does not have one. What was left has been scraped off.

Is there a reproduction out there that anyone knows about that can be purchased. What are my other options.

As always. Thank you in advance for any information. I am a newbie and this is still a learning process.


Messages In This Thread
Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 08-19-2012, 09:45 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-19-2012, 10:27 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 08-19-2012, 11:29 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by codefox1 - 08-19-2012, 01:01 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Paul Philco322 - 08-19-2012, 08:17 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 08-20-2012, 08:37 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-20-2012, 08:45 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by codefox1 - 08-20-2012, 01:17 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 08-20-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by codefox1 - 08-20-2012, 01:53 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-20-2012, 04:29 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 08-20-2012, 09:47 PM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 09-04-2012, 08:29 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Ron Ramirez - 09-04-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by winkydink - 09-04-2012, 08:58 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by Ron Ramirez - 09-04-2012, 09:22 AM
RE: Tube Testing - 46-200 - by TimC - 09-07-2012, 10:26 PM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>