Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another Philco 89 from H**l
#2

PART 2

Last night, the 89 seemed to be doing OK - until I pulled the trigger on my soldering gun to do something else, at which point it quit working again!

AAAARRGGGHHH!!!!!

To make a long story short, I robbed an oscillator coil from my "shelf queen" Model 32B (same basic circuitry, made to operate on 32 volts DC). Cooked it with a hair dryer, then rewound the open tickler winding. Installed it in the cantankerous 89 and...BINGO.

It came right to life, loud and clear. It passed my "stress test" of being picked up an inch or two from the bench and dropped repeatedly. I turned the soldering gun on and off; other things in the work room on and off; it kept on playing, rock solid.

I'll let it play the rest of this evening, and if it doesn't cut out anymore, THEN I will declare victory. Icon_biggrin

Lesson learned: From now on, I plan to use heat to bake EVERY Model 89 oscillator coil I encounter. I am convinced that doing so will help avoid such problems in the future.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Another Philco 89 from H**l - by Ron Ramirez - 10-04-2005, 06:22 PM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by fenbach - 01-31-2018, 10:50 PM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by morzh - 01-31-2018, 11:38 PM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by Radioroslyn - 02-01-2018, 12:59 AM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by madsowry - 02-09-2018, 01:17 AM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by Arran - 02-09-2018, 02:29 AM
RE: Another Philco 89 from H**l - by madsowry - 02-09-2018, 03:40 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 10-05-2005, 06:22 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 10-05-2005, 06:57 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 10-06-2005, 01:56 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 10-06-2005, 01:57 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 10-17-2005, 10:18 PM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 10-27-2005, 09:43 PM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 11-25-2005, 12:59 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5931 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5930 Guest(s)
Avatar

>