Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95
#4

Sounds like you over-sprayed and contaminated the trimmers or left behind too much coating on the plates on the tuning gang with residue - some cleaners leave behind a de-oxidizing oily compound, mainly usefull in switch contacts, but bad for a tuning cap or trimmer.

A non-residue cleaner is what you need that totally evaporates - many "tuner cleaners" leave behind lube compounds.

This residue changes the capacitance of the trimmers (or tuning sections) on the gang, throwing the alignment way off.

You'll have to carefully open the trimmers and clean the micas sheets and plates and re-align the set, it sounds like.

Chuck


Messages In This Thread
Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-25-2012, 10:11 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by codefox1 - 10-25-2012, 10:27 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-30-2012, 09:54 AM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by Chuck Schwark - 10-30-2012, 10:03 AM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-30-2012, 12:54 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-30-2012, 01:11 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-30-2012, 04:38 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-30-2012, 09:35 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-31-2012, 08:56 AM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 10-31-2012, 09:21 AM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 11-08-2012, 02:19 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by codefox1 - 11-08-2012, 02:36 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 11-08-2012, 02:45 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by codefox1 - 11-08-2012, 07:00 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by morzh - 11-10-2012, 07:28 PM
RE: Tuning Static Philco 42-PT95 - by winkydink - 11-12-2012, 10:28 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>