Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

philco 42-1012
#5

Resistors oft cannot be checked in-circuit.

I usually see first if there is any DC path in parallel to a resistor, if not (it connects to some capacitors or to a tube's grid) then it is OK to check in-circuit, if there is - you have to use your judgement.

For example, say I have 10K resistor and there are some branches off of it where you see 250K or some 1M resistors creating DC path, it still can be checked, but if the resistors are comparable then they will shunt the resistor you are checking.

A good indication of a bad resistor, if the DC path is present and it is still above the nominal, it is clearly bad as if anything it should be lower.

An electrolytic cap in parallel or through small resistance may give you headache when checking a resistor as it will take time to charge and during that time your value will be all over the place if using DMM and the analog meter will show low slowly rising value.


But as bad as resistors are, the caps are the worst as almost no cap can be adequately checked by a C-meter in-circuit, the resistors will distort the heck out of it.

I try not to snip the resistors off but unwrap the lead with a hot iron, but this is a bit tedious.

In my experience (which mind you is not too extensive when it comes to old radios) with the 1940 and older type radios almost 100% of the carbon resistors (dog-bones) have to go, none of them is below 20 to 80% deviation, most being 50% up which is unacceptable though the radio may still play and that dupes folks into thinking the resistors are OK.

Wire-wounds on the other hand, unless open, do not age at all value-wise, as the wire does not go anywhere; all wire-wounds I saw are right where they are supposed to be. Those I replaced were opened, probably due to overheating.


Messages In This Thread
philco 42-1012 - by murf - 11-14-2012, 11:06 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by codefox1 - 11-14-2012, 11:45 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by morzh - 11-16-2012, 12:36 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 11-16-2012, 07:56 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by morzh - 11-16-2012, 04:16 PM



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
The part/tool you get from HD is inside the plastic, like in a bubble.RodB — 07:17 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Got it. Still did not get the "Bubble" part.morzh — 07:10 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
No Mike. Clear plastic from the packaging of items you buy at Home Depot, the ones you can't open without a hack saw or ...RodB — 05:48 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Well thankfully that did not happen.Jim Dutridge — 05:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look! PS. Looked it up. They have kits and parts for mod...morzh — 02:45 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Paul, thanks, Anything can help. Gary Thanks, lemme look!morzh — 02:39 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
I deleted the other thread, as it was duplicate and did not have the photo. Please proceed with this one.morzh — 02:37 PM
46-1201 Trip Switch Spring
Hello, first post here, bear with me. I've been electronically refurbishing a 46-1201 that I received from a relative. ...ConcernedFeller — 01:46 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I am late to this post, amazing amount of work for a speaker Mike. You must like the challenge. I have a speaker from an...Paul Philco322 — 01:04 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, give this site a look for your spider. Can't hurt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! -GaryGarySP — 12:41 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 10897 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 10895 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>