Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-1008 code 122
#14

Hi Eric

The schematic you have will be for the Code 121 version of the 42-1008. Philco did not issue a revised schematic for Code 122, but they did publish the changes made to the Code 122 version, as follows:

Phono oscillator transformer (16) changes from 32-3785 to 32-3866.
Condenser (56), 0.2 uF, changes to 10 uF, part no. 30-2500.
Resistor (57), 2200 ohms, changes to 3300 ohms, 1/2 watt.
Power transformer (78 ), 32-8129, changes to 32-8217. The new transformer does not have a separate winding for the 7C6 oscillator tube filament. This filament is now connected in parallel with the other 6.3 volt tubes in the set.
Phono input transformer (91) changes to 32-8215.
Tuning shaft is 56-6196 FCP.
Tuning shaft drive cord is 31-2614.

After all of that, note that there is no mention of resistor (12) being changed - so I would replace it with a new 680 ohm resistor.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-26-2010, 02:49 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-05-2012, 08:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Michael Dennis - 06-05-2012, 08:20 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Sean - 06-06-2012, 11:24 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-06-2012, 06:21 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-18-2012, 10:12 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-29-2012, 09:58 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-29-2012, 10:07 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-16-2012, 09:57 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-20-2012, 10:05 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-22-2012, 01:28 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-22-2012, 05:14 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-23-2012, 12:09 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-23-2012, 03:27 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-23-2012, 08:25 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 12:15 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 06:23 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 06:52 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-24-2012, 07:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-27-2012, 10:56 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by codefox1 - 12-27-2012, 04:36 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Michael Dennis - 12-28-2012, 02:24 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 12:06 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 01:01 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 04:48 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 05:12 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 05:14 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 06:08 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 07:05 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 08:19 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 09:21 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-29-2012, 04:40 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-31-2012, 06:35 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 01-18-2013, 07:36 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by 7estatdef - 01-21-2013, 11:19 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 01-21-2013, 01:46 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-29-2013, 06:53 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by morzh - 06-29-2013, 10:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-30-2013, 05:39 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by morzh - 06-30-2013, 05:49 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 09-16-2013, 01:26 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eforrester - 11-22-2017, 11:52 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Radioroslyn - 11-23-2017, 11:58 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eforrester - 11-30-2017, 12:38 PM
Re: 42-1008 code 122 - by 7estatdef - 12-26-2010, 04:07 PM



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>