Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Not Restored as Indicated in Ad
#12

Today I stopped by the electronics store and bought the six caps needed to replace the paper jobbies in the set plus three electrolytics needed. The schematic called for 30 and a 25 and 20uf caps at 150v. I couldn't find those so I got a 47uf at 160v and two 30uf at the same voltage...ready to go for tonight.

Right after supper, my dog waited patiently in the computer room while I was out in the garage(attached to house) working on the radio. I replaced quite a few of the caps and then started replacing the ones in the can. I took it out, added a terminal block and tied all negative leads(I thought) to the terminal block and the the positive leads to their respective places. Once I got all that done I powered it up and got the loudest hum I had ever heard. I unplugged it and rechecked my wiring for shorts and all was fine there. I found even though I had tied the negatives to the terminal block, I failed to take another wire from there to B-. Turned it on again and after a few seconds the dial light got real bright and then went out and nothing came out of the radio. I unplugged it, looked over things again and discovered two of the electrolytics were indeed tied to each others negative but the larger 47uf cap had it's positive tied to what I thought was the negative of the other two!!.

I now have a dead radio, no sound at all. I checked the electrolytics and all three read around 112uf. I decided nothing to loose so turned it on and measured the voltage across them and zero. so was the voltage across the rectifier.

This is what happens when you're in a hurry and not paying enough attention to what you're doing and I was feeling guilty about neglecting my buddy in the next room and rushed too much. Have I just blown the electrolytics or those and all the tubes as well? Lessons learned the hard way-DON'T GET IN A HURRY!


Messages In This Thread
RE: Philco Not Restored as Indicated in Ad - by Elijah - 12-26-2012, 11:05 PM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM
A Marconi model 86
Thanks Arran; I don't even know what a double conversion is, but i do have a good friend In Nova Scotia that would k...Dan Walker — 07:01 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan; I've seen some Marconi sets like that before, one was a console though I'm not sure if it was a model 86. It's a...Arran — 05:09 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Milkjug plastic? Whatever is chosen for the spider, the material must be compatible with popular adhesives... Th...Chas — 05:05 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3494 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3493 Guest(s)
Avatar

>