Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-1008 code 122
#35

I put in new 600V electrolytics and no change. I decided that it was time to do some actual troubleshooting. I know this is a power supply problem because the detector grid is clean and the speaker hums even when the audio output tubes have been removed, which just ain't right. Icon_problem

So I check the transformer winding resistances. All of them look OK.

Then I checked transformer HV secondary output voltages at the rectifier tube pins. Plate voltages to center tap look about right, 345 VAC on either side. I checked filament voltages to ground next. My DMM shows them as 352 VAC on each side and goes kinda wacky when set to DC. Additionally, it's at 60hz, but should be 120hz if the full wave rectifier was working right and the filtering was bad. This really had me scratching my head because it's a NOS rectifier tube that I checked out in my other radio. How can a known good rectifier not be rectifying? Icon_eh

So just to be sure, I checked plate voltages again, but referenced directly to ground this time. First one reads 698 VAC, next one 0VAC. Eureka! Icon_idea

I had spliced on new wires inside the transformer and used heat shrink over the joints. Once the transformer heated a bit, the heat shrink migrated a little on one end of the HV secondary winding, shorting it to ground. Instead of having two legs at about 350VAC, I have one at 700VAC and the other at 0VAC.

I managed to open the clamshell enough to get in there and wrap electrical tape around the entire secondary side, covering all the splices. I put it back together and checked resistances to ground, and it all looks good.

Unfortunately, the largest bias resistor is now open ( Icon_eek it's a five watt, 150 ohm resistor!!!). I don't have one on hand, either.

Oh well, this will have to wait until I can get a replacement resistor. I guess I'll just go back to work on the little Crosley.

It's not how bad you mess up, it's how well you can recover.


Messages In This Thread
42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-26-2010, 02:49 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-05-2012, 08:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Michael Dennis - 06-05-2012, 08:20 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Sean - 06-06-2012, 11:24 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-06-2012, 06:21 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-18-2012, 10:12 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-29-2012, 09:58 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 07-29-2012, 10:07 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-16-2012, 09:57 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-20-2012, 10:05 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-22-2012, 01:28 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-22-2012, 05:14 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-23-2012, 12:09 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-23-2012, 03:27 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-23-2012, 08:25 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 12:15 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 06:23 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-24-2012, 06:52 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-24-2012, 07:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-27-2012, 10:56 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by codefox1 - 12-27-2012, 04:36 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Michael Dennis - 12-28-2012, 02:24 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 12:06 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 01:01 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 04:48 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 05:12 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 05:14 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 06:08 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 07:05 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-28-2012, 08:19 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-28-2012, 09:21 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-29-2012, 04:40 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 12-31-2012, 06:35 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 01-18-2013, 07:36 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by 7estatdef - 01-21-2013, 11:19 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 01-21-2013, 01:46 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-29-2013, 06:53 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by morzh - 06-29-2013, 10:02 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 06-30-2013, 05:39 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by morzh - 06-30-2013, 05:49 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eric T - 09-16-2013, 01:26 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eforrester - 11-22-2017, 11:52 PM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Radioroslyn - 11-23-2017, 11:58 AM
RE: 42-1008 code 122 - by Eforrester - 11-30-2017, 12:38 PM
Re: 42-1008 code 122 - by 7estatdef - 12-26-2010, 04:07 PM



Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>