Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1939 Packard Bell 48E
#2

I looked at the schematic, it's a nice set in that it has a pair of push-pull 6V6s but not a particularly elaborate one in terms of the front end. By the looks of things it's not much different then a typical 5 tube AC set, two IF cans, an oscillator adjustment, and an antenna adjustment for each band. According to the schematic the IF is 460, so nothing really unique there, likely you feed the test oscillator signal into the antenna through a .1 mf cap and adjust accordingly.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
1939 Packard Bell 48E - by RoyG - 08-08-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 10:29 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-09-2013, 10:33 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 11:35 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-15-2013, 09:26 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-15-2013, 09:47 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-15-2013, 10:49 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 12:20 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 02:15 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-16-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 09:09 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-16-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-16-2013, 11:56 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-17-2013, 12:12 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:36 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:54 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-18-2013, 02:31 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-18-2013, 11:39 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
On K2, pins 1&2 are shorted. On K4, Pins 1&3 are shorted. Others are OK. The voltages are the same except #4....R3Sons — 09:29 PM
Philco 40-120C Filament Wiring
Let's try to sort it out. So we are working with the same info here's the schematic I have: ...and here's the pin o...klondike98 — 09:03 PM
Philco 630csx power cord
I posted this on FB but knowing that not all of us use social media, it seemed sensible to ask my question here.  I r...Tynwald — 08:07 PM
Philco 40-155
At last, got this working well. Impressed has really nice reception and tone. Had a bad connection on one of the capaci...rogerh — 07:44 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Or you could just square the current :lol: As for the values, they are dependent on the 1 or 2-speaker system. The...morzh — 05:46 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
If you know the fc resistance you can use 120 ma nominal current through the resistor to get the voltage drop then calcu...RodB — 05:21 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Thanks Mike. I at least know why it is there if I don't fully understand it. I see where you talk about a cap and resist...dconant — 04:49 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Well, this cap you showed cannot possibly, due to the way it is constructed, be 1000pF (0.001). It can be in tens of pF....morzh — 03:13 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I have two schematics for this radio one shows the 47 block (126-226) and the other (121-221) does not. My radio does no...dconant — 02:32 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
No, that cannot be the 47. The 47 is a regular backelite block cap. Look at the chassis picture, it is shown there. Rig...morzh — 01:45 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>