Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1939 Packard Bell 48E
#17

Actually there was the trio KING AM-FM-TV owned by the Bullitt sisters. Since the early 50's there was always a KING-FM.(classical)
Though the stations now have different owners there is still a KING-FM and a KING-TV channel 5. The FCC allows the use of call letters under different owners if there is an agreement. The group that bought 1090 in the spinoff likely did not want to spend the money
to work this out....big mistake, with the decline of AM they were really the ones who needed to keep the identity. Viewers watch NBC on channel 5 or channel 5 News, TV call letters are of little importance.
Another example of this sad phenomenon WJAR 920 once top tier
Providence station with an NBC affiliation and WJAR-TV NBC 10.
920 is now WHJJ almost non existent because it got lost in the shuffle after losing it identity. There are at least 100 more examples of this.


Messages In This Thread
1939 Packard Bell 48E - by RoyG - 08-08-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 10:29 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-09-2013, 10:33 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-09-2013, 11:35 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-15-2013, 09:26 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-15-2013, 09:47 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-15-2013, 10:49 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 12:20 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 02:15 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-16-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-16-2013, 08:40 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by BrendaAnnD - 08-16-2013, 09:09 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-16-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-16-2013, 11:56 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Arran - 08-17-2013, 12:12 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:36 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by chris25260880 - 08-17-2013, 11:54 PM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Phlogiston - 08-18-2013, 02:31 AM
RE: 1939 Packard Bell 48E - by Paul Philco322 - 08-18-2013, 11:39 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
If you are still on 5TPO, you lost me there. What X7? What Points 1 and 2?morzh — 08:37 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Quick progress report: X7 is broken. Only one leg soldered, the other missing and the diode is cracked. I've replaced...R3Sons — 05:05 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Oh...and you have electrolytic caps there. All need to go and be replaced.morzh — 04:36 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Thanks, will do.R3Sons — 01:25 PM
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
UPDATE: I was able to pick up a signal generator on the cheap (amazingly enough) on feebay and I did an IF alignment fol...captainclock1988 — 09:53 AM
Philco 91 Schematic
Hi Rod, The resistor connects to pin 4 and the ungrounded side of block 9. From pin 9 of the RF tube to one side of ...dconant — 09:34 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
I just found your post. I have this exact same model, and have had it since 1985 when I was 15 years old! I performed a ...MuzzcoVW — 09:11 AM
B&K 1077B no video
Hello Tim, I would if it's a leaky Capacitor So are all 3 of those B- voltages low then ? Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:55 AM
B&K 1077B no video
I found a schematic and think I have the problem traced down to the minus power supply. I have very low voltages that go...TV MAN — 12:41 AM
RCA 15X
I'd try replacing the bulb first and if that doesn't do it, then change the 35Z5 and see if the problem goes away.NostalgiaRadioTime — 12:28 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5296 online users. [Complete List]
» 5 Member(s) | 5291 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar
Avatar

>