37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED

Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED

davemc
Member

Posts: 154
Threads: 58
Joined: Dec 2005
City: Dandridge, TN

03-03-2008, 06:07 PM

The parts lists says 30-2171, but the part itself is labeled 30-2171-X and definitely says NON POLARIZED - maybe Philco made a change. It functions as the RF/converter screen bypass and oscillator filter cap. The main filter cap in the power supply says electrolytic.

I see no reason why it has to be non-polarized, and will restuff with standard electrolytics. Maybe they wanted a paper type cap in the application, vs. an electrolytic. I might cheat and install a .1uf film cap across the electrolytics just in case (if there's room in the can).

Website Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Thread Closed

Messages In This Thread

37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by davemc - 02-25-2008, 06:56 PM

RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by harley92 - 01-25-2018, 04:12 PM

RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by Arran - 01-26-2018, 12:02 AM

RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by harley92 - 02-01-2018, 06:30 PM

RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by tbone - 02-03-2018, 04:36 PM

RE: 37-624 Mail Filter Cap 34 is NON-POLARIZED - by harley92 - 02-03-2018, 09:07 PM

[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 02-25-2008, 09:28 PM

[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 07:13 AM

[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 02-26-2008, 07:59 AM

[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 08:13 AM

[No subject] - by Steve D - 02-26-2008, 12:38 PM

[No subject] - by davemc - 02-26-2008, 01:06 PM

[No subject] - by davemc - 03-03-2008, 06:07 PM

[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 03-03-2008, 11:10 PM

[No subject] - by davemc - 03-14-2008, 05:25 PM

[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 03-20-2008, 10:58 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G 10-1/2" 65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H 10-1/2" 77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth! I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example! Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

Who's Online

There are currently 6150 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6149 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me