Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-650 schematic discrepancy???
#1

My latest toy, a 37-650, worked great when I got it and now about 3/4 done with the resistors and caps and still plays great. Tag shows it was rebuilt in 1963, looks like a number of caps were replaced and a little wiring.

The problem is that I have a difference between the actual radio and the schematic at the volume pot. Looking at the schematic, part #40, a 75pf cap, is missing. What I have is resistor #41, 40k resistor is tied to cap #43 and the top of the pot, not to the center tap. Center tap is tied to cap #33. I did install a 75pf cap between top and center taps, but I cannot say it made any difference. The tone sounds great except the first setting almost sound like a pocket radio... normal for this setting??? The volume pot looks to be original, it is a 3 tap 2Meg.

Also in my output section, I have a resistor not on the diagram and looks like it was from the factory, it is between the junctions of parts #45, 46 and parts #47 and 53. I think it is a 330k ohm, any ideas why this is here? I left it in as the radio plays fine.

Thanks, Don

http://www.theoldradiofixerupperguy.com/...37-650.pdf


Messages In This Thread
37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by raydog - 03-29-2014, 05:42 PM
RE: 37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by raydog - 04-02-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: 37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by codefox1 - 04-05-2014, 12:49 AM
RE: 37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by raydog - 04-05-2014, 01:21 PM
RE: 37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by Joeztech - 04-06-2014, 07:31 AM
RE: 37-650 schematic discrepancy??? - by raydog - 04-16-2014, 10:00 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
462ron
Mike when I got to the guy’s house to pick up the set, he gave me a tour of his home and garage. Wow, his living room co...462ron — 09:10 AM
91H Code 126 Restore
I'm pretty sure that the dotted line I circled in an earlier post signifies that it is applicable to the 226 model which...RealRider — 08:05 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello bob, that underside looks like it is all original ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM
Philco 49-1040
Oh yes, many bumblebees and loktal tubes. The cutout is for the speaker.  Here's a photo from a different set. Bob Andersen — 12:59 AM
Philco 49-1040
Bob; Looks like another "Bumble Bee" special, like my Brand Z T.O radios. Is that section they took out of ...Arran — 12:19 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello Bob, You are like the home for lost tv's like how people bring pets home ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:00 AM
Philco 49-1040
I thought I had an arrangement to restore this set for a customer but his wife said heck no.  Instead, he gave it to me....Bob Andersen — 10:29 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I kept working on reassembly this week. I wasn’t able to solder for a few days while it was too cold (single digit low t...jrblasde — 09:27 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Well, powering it up would be too good to be true, and I had that feeling. Before I did, I decided to check the coils...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Thanks Chas, sure will give it a look!morzh — 03:39 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4344 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 4340 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>