Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Replacing a Field Coil with a PM Speaker - Please Help
#11

What happened to the original speaker? Was it missing? If you still have it hold onto it, they can usually be reconed or rebuilt. I'm with Morzh on this, a proper filter choke is the better option for the power supply as opposed to a resistor. Though you can get away with using a resistor in a Pi filter arrangement in a 4 tuber like a model 84, and it will work fine if you use larger filter capacitors to compensate for the lower inductance, don't try it in a larger tube count set using 8 tubes or more. It's still preferable to use a filter choke (or a solid state substitute) as opposed to a resistor.
The reason is simple, a filter choke or field coil is an inductor, and inductors resist fluctuations (or changes) in voltage through inductive reactance, but they pass DC. A resistor resists a given amount of voltage depending on the current load, so the more current load there is the more voltage drop you will see across that resistor. Resistors also don't filter and regulate as well as chokes, so you will need larger caps to not only compensate for the voltage drop across the resistor but to filter out the extra ripple.
In the early AC sets high value capacitors were bulky and expensive, the only types they had were large value paper capacitors, so they used paper capacitors of 1-2 uf but used two or three filter chokes to get rid of the AC ripple. When they came out with wet, and later dry electrolytic capacitors, they suddenly had inexpensive high value capacitors in a compact package, so they could reduce the size and number of the filter chokes needed, usually incorporating the filter choke into the speaker field coil making it perform a double duty.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
RE: Replacing a Field Coil with a PM Speaker - Please Help - by Arran - 04-15-2014, 11:39 PM



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
What should I offer?
I think you have a chance at purchasing a 48-1286, based on the cabinet hardware. Only 8700 were produced, so it is a r...GarySP — 02:28 PM
What should I offer?
I am not sure what radio it is, but seems like a 1950 AM/FM set. Or from 1948, possibly one similar to 48-1264. In any ...morzh — 12:44 PM
What should I offer?
I have an opportunity to acquire this radio-phono, but the owner wants me to make an offer. Tried searching images, but...nocusr — 12:29 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
So, I unwound the coil; it is 700 turns of AWG40 wire. I modeled it on a couple of different calculators and I got about...morzh — 12:29 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Ron From the conversation, it was my impression he was a pretty old dude who is looking to place his radios in good h...morzh — 12:16 PM
Philco 49-1040
Yes, and it's surprisingly common for early TVs to be mostly or all original. My thinking is that they were retired ear...Bob Andersen — 11:59 AM
91H Code 126 Restore
Hi Nick, Usually the dashed lines connected to components means the part is a substitute in the circuit for specific ...RodB — 09:42 AM
462ron
Mike when I got to the guy’s house to pick up the set, he gave me a tour of his home and garage. Wow, his living room co...462ron — 09:10 AM
91H Code 126 Restore
I'm pretty sure that the dotted line I circled in an earlier post signifies that it is applicable to the 226 model which...RealRider — 08:05 AM
Philco 49-1040
Hello bob, that underside looks like it is all original ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:07 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>