Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

116B vs 650B
#9

A more accurate test of the set's performance would be to measure the AGC voltage coming off of the detector of each set, receiving the same station with the same antenna. The AGC action of the set masks the true gain of it, but the output of the detector tells how much gain the set had before the detector. I'm sure that the 116 has lots more gain than the 650, but the AGC in it pulls back more on the reins, and that causes the 116 to appear to have the same gain.

Get a VTVM, and connect it to the detector outputs in as nearly the same on each set, then see what it says. There should be a difference.

This is why you need an indicator of receiver output when you align it. The audio output of a radio is no accurate indicator of resonance when you are peaking the alignment. True, it was the way you indicated before the late thirties, but VTVM's were almost unknown much before the forties. It's even possible with a 20,000 ohm per volt meter to measure the detector's output. On a 20 volt scale for instance, the resistive load of the meter would be 400,000 ohms, and the detector could survive with that easily. If you look at the circuits of the old Hammarlund communication sets, the "S" meter is actually a straight voltmeter across the detector output.


Messages In This Thread
116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-20-2008, 09:53 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-21-2008, 08:59 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-21-2008, 09:35 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 10:31 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by etech - 10-26-2008, 11:46 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-26-2008, 11:51 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Ron Ramirez - 10-27-2008, 10:06 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 10:10 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 10-27-2008, 04:45 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 10-27-2008, 08:55 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Texasrocker - 10-30-2008, 03:14 AM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by Doug Houston - 11-01-2008, 10:32 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by MinnesotaHam - 12-01-2008, 10:14 PM
Re: 116B vs 650B - by BDM - 12-05-2008, 10:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Here are the links. 6TPZ and 5TPO The speakers are good. I've tried several known good ones. I just have to fi...R3Sons — 06:27 PM
Philco 91 Tuning Condenser
I just found a set screw. Was able to turn dial just enough to see it and loosen it. I have it off now.dconant — 06:14 PM
Philco 91 Tuning Condenser
Hello, Does anyone know how the dial plate comes off the tuning condenser shaft? The dial itself id so warped I can't...dconant — 06:01 PM
Eico 368 TV/FM Sweep Generator
Ron, for the future: In order to change the name of teh topic, 1. Go to the very first post. 2. Hit "Edit...morzh — 04:29 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Transistors are easy. No converters. If you have input voltage, then just put some signal through. Or touch your fin...morzh — 04:25 PM
462ron
Hi Mike, I believe I tried different ways to change the header for my post but no luck. Anyway thanks for changing it fo...462ron — 04:02 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Since these radios operated in harsh environments (temp changes and vibration) you could touch a soldering iron to all t...GarySP — 03:18 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Thank you Gary. Hi Morzh. These radios are 6 transistor radios. Sadly no tubes. Thanks though.R3Sons — 02:19 PM
Heathkit Sweep Generator TS-4
Ron Instead of Quick reply, go to New Reply, then go to the title of the very first post, and change the title text the...morzh — 02:00 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
I am not a specialist in car radios. I suspect they might use vibrators to convert 12V to acceptable tube voltages, so ...morzh — 01:58 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>