Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

capacitor crossreference
#3

Howard-
The .01's are a very common value and readily available. This is not a critical value. 400v should be sufficient.

The .006 can easily be replaced with the common .05 or .047, or even a .01; it's not a critical value either; 350v or higher is best.

The 6mF is long obsolete and is usually replaced with a 10mF; it's not critical either but don't replace it with a smaller value; use 300v minimum here. The new caps are much smaller and higher voltage than the old ones. Be sure to disconnect at least one connection on the old cap if you are leaving it in place; don't connect the new cap across the old one.

The 110mmF is not super critical, nor is it very often bad; I would leave it alone.

Pete AI2V


Messages In This Thread
capacitor crossreference - by Howard Stricklin - 02-15-2009, 02:22 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Syl - 02-15-2009, 03:27 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by AI2V - 02-15-2009, 03:36 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Syl - 02-16-2009, 12:35 AM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by codefox1 - 02-16-2009, 07:02 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Syl - 02-17-2009, 08:07 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by gary rabbitt - 02-17-2009, 08:23 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Syl - 02-18-2009, 12:33 AM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by FStephenMasek - 02-18-2009, 01:59 AM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Jim Berg - 02-18-2009, 03:11 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by gary rabbitt - 02-22-2009, 04:42 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by gary rabbitt - 03-05-2009, 01:43 AM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Ron Ramirez - 03-09-2009, 09:05 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Ron Ramirez - 09-23-2009, 09:37 AM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Ron Ramirez - 09-23-2009, 03:39 PM
Re: capacitor crossreference - by Raleigh - 10-03-2009, 01:22 AM



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Rich yes, this is the way I got it. I have just put it on the table and took it apart. I suspect it even might work,...morzh — 11:31 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
Hello mike, What nice looking radio I have one AK in my collection it's a console I have not started restoring it yet ....radiorich — 11:21 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5299 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5298 Guest(s)
Avatar

>