Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Noise in 680X and 37-690
#3

Thanks Ron. That is the kind of info I was looking for. I have all the schematics but only a few service bulletins. I do know the crackling noise is not in the power stage but somewhere in the driver stage on both sets. Pulling the 6F6G (or the 42 in the 680X) the power stages are absolutely quiet.
By the way, here's a story on my 38-690. It belonged to a friend of mine who paid someone to restore it. I knew the fellow who did the rebuild and it was a fine job. My friend introduced me to his fiance and the first thing she said to me was "Hi I'm Nancy and I hate radios". Needless to say, within a month he called me to see if I wanted to buy it. I think it cost me about $400 and that was over ten years ago. The only thing I did with it was to remove paint off both chassis. Someone who owned it before my friend had painted both chassis with silver paint. They were not rusted. I can only guess they wanted it to look like a Scott. After about three evenings and paint remover and some q tips, it looks like it should now.

Fred


Messages In This Thread
Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Fred R - 12-28-2005, 10:23 PM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Sam samuelian - 05-22-2012, 05:42 AM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Arran - 05-22-2012, 06:51 PM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-22-2012, 07:01 PM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Sam samuelian - 05-22-2012, 10:25 PM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by morzh - 05-23-2012, 10:06 AM
RE: Noise in 680X and 37-690 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-30-2005, 12:37 AM
[No subject] - by Fred R - 12-30-2005, 10:41 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 12-30-2005, 11:30 AM
[No subject] - by Chuck Schwark - 12-30-2005, 12:00 PM
[No subject] - by Frank - 04-13-2006, 10:17 AM
Noise in output - by AI2V - 04-15-2006, 09:27 AM
[No subject] - by Ron Ramirez - 04-16-2006, 10:06 PM
[No subject] - by Frank - 04-19-2006, 09:03 AM
[No subject] - by Frank - 04-24-2006, 08:55 AM
[No subject] - by Frank - 04-25-2006, 08:41 AM



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>