Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Rebuilding a Philco Tropic 42-730EZ
#31

I would probably leave out the .003 uF caps, as you mentioned Ron. They would be an unnecessary risk for failure given the high voltage across them. 

The only reason I can think of for using them would be to reduce the RF  harmonics produced as each diode suddenly stops conduction on the AC waveform. You sometimes see these caps with silicon diode rectifiers in solid state receivers. I could see the need for them if this radio covered the LF 200-400 Khz band, where the RF noise generated would be the greatest. Perhaps a similar model had a LF band and they carried over the power supply design?
#32

I would say the caps are filter caps and the resistors are load resistors...so its a Capacitor Input Filter Icon_smile Smooth out ripple to produce less "noise". That's my best guess on what I remember from college!!

"To smooth the output of the rectifier a reservoir capacitor is used - placed across the output of the reciter and in parallel with the load.. This capacitor charges up when the voltage from the rectifier rises above that of the capacitor and then as the rectifier voltage falls, the capacitor provides the required current from its stored charge.
It should be remembered that the only way discharge path for the capacitor, apart from internal leakage is through the load to the rectifier / smoothing system."
#33

Checked with engineer here at work (electronics company), he agreed and said they are also to make the circuit more resistive...and to help bleed #67 and #68. So if you omit the resistors, you should be fine....just don't run the radio then unplug it and grab the plug!! You may get a little bite!
#34

hate to rain on your parade, Icon_smile but the analysis is incorrect. Those are NOT reservoir capacitors. As they are NOT placed across the rectifier's output. And not big enough to be a reservoir for this kind. They have to be about 3 orders of magnitude larger for that.

But...this is not really important.
#35

LOL! Ill tell our engineer he blew that one! I thought they were just filter caps, he add in the reservoir part....and I took him at his word on that...sorry for that!!

(You would think the engineers here would know, since its an RF company!!!)
#36

Oh.....RF engineers..... Icon_smile No, no, they are great folk, and myself I do not know the first thing about RF, this is a black magic for me, but as I remember those I worked with, power supplies for them is as much of a black magic Icon_smile

In fact when each diode conducts the respective capacitor connects in parallel to the last filter "reservoir" cap (40uF) WHILE the first filter cap (16uF) is being charged. However 3nF to 40uF is 1/13,000 times difference and this is how much extra "reservoir" action you get.

However the RF interference that gets through the capacitive barrier between Primary and the Secondary, usually as a Common mode noise, will appear on every single lug of the transformer's secondary windings (and will be approximately the same).

the main reservoir cap (16uF) will not filter it out as it is common mode.
And the Ground (Chassis) is decoupled from the transformer (from the centerpoint) by the Field coil acting as a filter, so the second filter cap (40uF) will see it now as differential, BUT as an electrolytic it is too inductive to filter it well, so it will appear on the B+ relative to Ground.

This is where the common mode filter comes in, these two small caps will short the Ground and the transformer at RF frequencies, effectively eliminating the common mode becoming a diff. mode at B+ relative to Ground due to the Field Coil.

Now usually these caps are placed in the primary circuit, tying both L and N wires to the Chassis through 3-15nF caps. This however requires Y-safety caps (unknown at the time, there were no Y or X rated caps, hence the Death capacitors). So maybe this was an ingenious way of defeating Death cap problem by placing all caps at the secondary side.

Of course the rating of these caps had to be much higher, as each half can easily provide 350VAC when unloaded.
#37

From what I can see in the schematic, caps 73 & 74 go from each plate of the rectifier tube to ground. They are isolated from the mains by the power transformer and so cannot short out across the mains. I would use regular 600 or 1000 V poly caps for them. I believe they chose to use the RL circuit with R78 and R79 on the primary (mains) side of the transformer for just that reason, and to also provide filtering there. It is the only explanation I can think of for their being there.
#38

Yes, exactly. No Y or X rating needed, I would use 1000V DC or 600VAC rated caps.
#39

I'm enjoying the discussion, folks. It's great that we can have a good debate here without it deteriorating into fighting as sometimes happens on, well...you know, that other place. Icon_wink

But I'm still going to leave (73) and (74) out.

If I have time this afternoon, I am going to reinstall the electrolytic cap cans and the audio output transformer, hook up an AC cord, and try it out. Icon_think  If not, I'll do so tomorrow afternoon. We are expecting a visitor this evening, so I don't really have much time for tinkering today.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#40

I do not think you need them to be honest, as I said in the beginning, but in the days of yore you might.
resistors too Icon_smile

If you find out you have some interference....you could always add them later. In front (Y-caps) or where they are on the sch.
#41

Well, I've done everything but attach the speaker connector to the new speaker wiring harness. Electrolytics reinstalled, audio output transformer reinstalled, new AC cord installed. I've tried it out with the 80 removed and everything lights up as it should.

Photos later. I'll probably try it out tomorrow afternoon.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#42

I agree, there should not be any 80 next to a Tropic Icon_lol
#43

The latest photos:

[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum...e00010.jpg]

[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum...e00011.jpg]

[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum...e00012.jpg]

I hope it works as well as it looks...and if I may say so myself, I think it looks pretty good. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#44

Does too!
#45

Indeed it does, Ron! Excellent work Icon_thumbup Icon_clap

Seeing your dial glass, with the typical rotted and crumbling gaskets under the mounting clamps, reminds me of how I've been fixing that problem for quite some time now. I use rubber bands! A standard rubber band is the right width, so all I do is cut it apart, cut it into strips and apply with a light coat of spray adhesive. Works like a charm. Icon_lol

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org




Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
1 - 0v - correct 2 - 0v - correct 3 - 0v - --------------------- both 3 and 4 should be the same. Check L2 for being ope...morzh — 05:15 PM
B&K 1077B no video
I'm going to get back into it tonight. but I disconnected the 2 main resistors off this supply going to different parts ...TV MAN — 04:04 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Sorry. The test points are as follows: 1 - 0v 2 - 0v 3 - 0v 4 - 12v 5 - 0v 6 - 11.9v 7 - 12v 8 - 12v 9 - 12v...R3Sons — 02:09 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
OK, so 18 and 19 as they should be. What is "everything else?" Try to be more specific in your descriptions:...morzh — 12:44 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Yeah, I'm still on 5TPO. Sorry, my bad, points 1 and 2 should be points 18 and 19 (easy mistake  :think: )  X7 is shown ...R3Sons — 11:42 AM
Philco 40-120C Filament Wiring
Hi folks, I'm in the process of restoring a Philco 40-120C and I'm finding the wiring to be a bit puzzling. According to...bluecap — 11:28 AM
462ron
Hi Levi, here’s just a thought. Most radios run the oscillator higher than the dial setting. Say you set your radio to 1...462ron — 10:10 AM
1930s Stewart-Warner Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Another Update: I found a couple of damaged coils inside this radio that might have something to do with why this radio ...captainclock1988 — 10:51 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
If you are still on 5TPO, you lost me there. What X7? What Points 1 and 2?morzh — 08:37 PM
6TPZ and 5TPO Radio Help
Quick progress report: X7 is broken. Only one leg soldered, the other missing and the diode is cracked. I've replaced...R3Sons — 05:05 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6681 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 6679 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>