Posts: 234
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2008
City: Mission Viejo, CA
Do you know the cross-over parts numbers for the Philco 38-690 volume control, Philco part number 33-5240? They one on my 38-690 has some bad spots, and it has been cleaned, so it would be nice to find a replacement.
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hi,
I'll search all the 37/38 Philco dealer parts catalogs for that part
when I get home from work this evening. Prob. in there.
Chuck
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Looking for the values of the dual-pot volume control on the Model 38-690.
All Philco service bulletins and 1937-40 Philco parts catalogs do not show the resistances
of the two sections. Only the Philco part number: 33-5240.
Seems Philco never published parts values in their 38-690 service bulletin.
Any help appreciated,
Chuck
Posts: 237
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 2007
City: Gladwin, MI
(12-07-2015, 11:13 PM)Chuck Schwark Wrote: Looking for the values of the dual-pot volume control on the Model 38-690.
All Philco service bulletins and 1937-40 Philco parts catalogs do not show the resistances
of the two sections. Only the Philco part number: 33-5240.
Seems Philco never published parts values in their 38-690 service bulletin.
Any help appreciated,
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
While the parts list does not show the values, they are printed on the schematic as part #75 at 500K and part #76 at 100K.
BTW, keep up the good work. I have your data package for my 38-690 code 125 and it has been invaluable.
Thanks again!
Ed
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2015, 07:16 PM by etech.)
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Ah, ok. My Philco original schematics do NOT show any parts values. ??
Could be a very early edition maybe. Will have to research.....
Thanks,
Chuck
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hi again,
While the parts list and schematic I have does not show the values, they were provided by
another member here on the Phorum.
Part #75 is 500K and part #76 is 100K, for the dual pot.
Chuck
Posts: 237
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 2007
City: Gladwin, MI
(12-09-2015, 10:20 AM)Chuck Schwark Wrote: Ah, ok. My Philco original schematics do NOT show any parts values. ??
Could be a very early edition maybe. Will have to research.....
Thanks,
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
I took the information from the schematic you sent me as part of my packet. It is marked "38-690 Code 125 Figure 1". On the back side of this page is the alignment page and the chassis pictorial page.
Best regards,
Ed
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Hmmmm....time to retire. (sigh)
Posts: 2,573
Threads: 337
Joined: Jun 2013
City: lawrenceville nj
retire
na you just need a few martini`s to start the day. you`ll be fine
[Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...ghting.jpg]
Some day, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me. But until that day, accept this justice as a gift
mafiamen2
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Not with those 1/2 filled glasses I wouldn't!
AND, they're not chilled!!!
Posts: 236
Threads: 43
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Hi Guys,
Did you ever get a good cross over part no. for the volume control? My 690 seems to be bad at the low vol section. I'd like to replace it if I can find a suitable part.
Steve
Posts: 16,305
Threads: 569
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Steve
have you tried to ask Mark Oppat?
People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
The speaker table error?
|
G 10-1/2" 65, 76, 87, 95
Push-Pull 45's
2766
0.7
550
3200
H 10-1/2" 77, 96
Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s.
This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
>>What a behemoth!
A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM |
Philco 70 antenna lead
|
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth! I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example! Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM |
Philco 70 antenna lead
|
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM |
Philco model 60
|
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM |
A Marconi model 86
|
Dan
Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response.
morzh — 07:15 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d17/00d175793acc78e93ba4255d4ab3e9188a10e078" alt=">"
|