Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

1930 Philco model 30, 41, or 96?
#16

I haven't really studied the schematic yet, I've looked it over some and the set seems really simple. Unfortunately out west in the rural areas we're limited as to what is available as far as swap meets and hard parts. Maintenance parts are easy to get.
#17

In earlier sets like this one, same as in larger radios with more serious acoustics Philco did not use the field coil as the main filter choke (that also would require hum-bucking wire) but did use separate large chokes (also in 20, 70, 90, 16, 116 and its permutations, and all those early consoles whose chassis look similar to yours) that look like a mid-size transformer.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#18

This set takes 3 type 24 tubes, is there a difference between a 24 and a 24A or are they both the same type of tube?
#19

The 24A was the replacement for the 24, and as a general rule they can be interchanged except in some Crosley's that used the 24 as an oscillator.

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#20

The 24s in this case look to be part of the tuning on the model 77 Philco, I was told there was an amperage difference between the 24s and 24A. In this application am I okay with the 24A or should I continue looking for type 24's?
#21

24A's should do fine in your radio.  RCA designed them as a direct replacement for the 24's but with some improvements  (faster warm-up), except they would no longer work as an oscillator, which the tube was never designed to do in the first place.

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#22

So far I have been able to get all the tubes except the 45's which seem to go up in price and get expensive. The other part it is missing is the cover that goes over the top of the type 24 tubes. Is this going to be a hard part to find?
#23

You might check with Mark Oppat at this site.
http://www.oldradioparts.net/hardware.html




Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Gary I in fact did, on a 38-14, I think, where I had a speaker with the dead coil. Well...it kinda worked. Kinda, be...morzh — 10:38 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, what ever happened to that plan you had to try using a rare earth magnet to magnetize the pole? This looks like a...GarySP — 10:25 PM
RCA T62 is playing.....
Beautiful set.morzh — 09:07 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Well....here it is. The green stuff. Unfortunately, probably penetrates deep. I opened the top layer and saw that: ...morzh — 08:58 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: Really nice workmanship!!! Top of the chassis looks great. Sorry about the long winded e...MrFixr55 — 08:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Thank you for your reply. I will check voltages on the other tubes, look at resistor 23 and cap 25, etc. If all else fai...bluecap — 07:58 PM
RCA T62 is playing.....
Nice looking set great save. DavidDavid — 07:48 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Hello Jim, I have done several 89s. The trick is to move the drum in or out on it's shaft. You will need to loosen a set...dconant — 07:36 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
MrFixr Yes, it is my plan to go with 45rpm spider if I go that far. No, the pole was not left-handed as I unscrewed ...morzh — 07:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Change the tube. Check the tube's bias network. Are any other tubes experience the drop or just this?` Is resistor 23 OK...morzh — 07:09 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 7036 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 7035 Guest(s)
Avatar

>